This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 23 February 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Regulator chastises managers forcing GP practices to prepare for CQC registration

By Craig Kenny | 03 Jan 2012

NHS managers trying to force GP practices to prepare for registration with the CQC early have been slapped down by the regulator, it has been revealed.

In a move to reassure GPs over registration, the CQC has also pledged that surgeries won't be closed over not having disabled access and that supporting evidence won't always be necessary to prove compliance with standards.

However, GP leaders warn that the beleaguered commission is likely face a shake-up and the requirements for registration may change before April 2013, when regulation of GPs begins.

In answers to questions submitted by members of the Family Doctor Association, the CQC said it was taking a tough line over PCTs which have jumped the regulatory gun, as Pulse reported recently.

A response from the regulator said: ‘PCTs should not be telling practices to do things in the name of CQC.'

‘GP practices are not subject to regulation by CQC until April 2013 and where we have found out that this has gone on we have spoken to the PCTs involved and will continue to do so.'

The regulator also said it would trust ‘honest declarations' of compliance from practices, though it warns that such a declaration is legally binding, adding: ‘Failure to declare possible non-compliance is a serious issue.'

The CQC said practices would be allowed to declare themselves ‘non-compliant' with core standards if they also had a clear programme to meet these in time.

‘We expect a practice which is delivering good quality care to already be meeting the majority, if not all, of the essential standards,' it says.  ‘We do not require evidence of compliance to be sent in with the application form.'

There are reassurances too that toy boxes, carpets, curtains or  books in waiting rooms are unlikely to cause any concerns or lead to a failure on standards, as long as any risks have been identified.  If a building does not have disabled access, GPs would have to show that they have identified any risks and taken ‘reasonable steps' to manage them, for instance.

Dr Michael Taylor, former chair of the FDA and a GP in Heywood, Lancashire, attended consultation meetings with the CQC and said the regulator was looking at ways of making registration easier for practices.

He said: ‘They are looking at different ways of making it easy for practices to be able to skip through the hoops. They suspect that 80-90% of practices will be performing OK.

‘RCGP accredited or training practices are likely to be waved through as they will already be having visits from another authority. For those practices who don't have that it's likely they will have to justify themselves a bit better. Those where there are worries will be visited.'

However, he warned that these early signals may be subject to change. ‘There's a lot of hot air and activity around the CQC at the moment and rumblings in Government about how to make it more effective. The cards have been thrown in the air and we are waiting to see how they come down. ‘

‘However, there's no reason for GPs to be anxious at this moment.'

Click here for your last chance to win an Amazon Kindle by giving us your views on GP employment

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, Other healthcare professional,
03 Jan 2012
Another breathtaking example of the CQC running with the hare and hunting with the hounds. They have been making it quite clear that they would be starting this next year, and that the first practices to go through the process would need to start preparing this year. This sudden "ooh those naughty PCTs telling you to do stuff when the info on our website is quite clear and explicit about expectations" is just another example of how this nauseating failure of an organisation is prepared to twist and turn at every opportunity to ensure its own survival.
Average (3Votes)
Top
Anonymous, PCT,
03 Jan 2012
Completely agree with above post. The CQC and DOH have been making it quite clear that GP practices will be expected to BE compliant in 2013 and if they don't start preparing now how are they supposed to achieve this? Dental practices were expected to be prepared - talk about moving the goalposts. Whilst I agree that there is no reason for GPs to be anxious, surely preparation is the key and if they can't achieve ESSENTIAL standards, surely they shouldn't be delivering NHS care? The standards are hardly unachieveable.
Average (2Votes)
Top
David Mcbride, Manager,
03 Jan 2012
I am starting to get very tired of anything bad in the NHS being the responsibility of 'NHS managers' even if this really means GP commissioners, medical directors, PEC members etc. It is very rare for any positive development to be credited to 'NHS managers' as this will almost always go to an innovative group of GPs, nurses, clinicians etc even if the initiative was developed, supported and implemented by the same beleaguered 'NHS managers'.

Come on Pulse, the Daily Liar can almost be excused for such biased nonsense but it is time that your editorial team started to be a little more critical of its own headlines. GPs are now 'NHS managers' whether they like it or not. Let's stop pretending all these things are invented by nameless/faceless bureaucrats without any scrutiny by clinicians. It is offensive.
Average (6Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Manager,
04 Jan 2012
Once again CQC demonstrates poor judgement in allowing GP practices to ignore infection prevention & control best practice. Dont they know preventable community acquired infections are on the increase!!
Average (2Votes)
Top
Robert Burley, GP Partner,
12 Jan 2012
Community Acquired infections are acquired in the community not as a result of visiting a GPs surgery. Infection control standards for PRIMARY care are laid out by NICE CG2 and discuss the need to wash hands between patients and keep sharps bins out of childrens reach. The need to denude a GPs desk of all ancils and wipe down the patients chair between each patient are examples of secondary care infection protocols which are imported by ICNs with out though or application and then adopted as 'rules' by CQC.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Should GPs begin switching patients to atorvastatin immediately? Read the full story here

LATEST FORUM POSTS