This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 23 February 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Revealed: GMC pays £280,000 a year on private health insurance for its staff

By Andrew McNicoll | 06 Jan 2012

Exclusive The GMC spends approximately £280,000 a year on providing private medical insurance to almost 500 of its staff, Pulse can reveal.

Information released by the GMC this week shows the regulator, which receives the vast majority of its funding from doctors' fees, has offered its employees private medical insurance since 1997, and now provides it to 480 of its 640 permanent staff across the UK, at an average cost of £583 per employee.

GPs currently pay £420 a year to the GMC for ‘annual retention fees', although Pulse revealed last month that the fee will be cut for the first time in the regulator's history in April, to £390 a year. GMC papers show an estimated £91.5m of its £96.6m income for 2012 is expected to come from doctors' retention fees and registrations.

The GMC said its spending on private medical insurance is ‘kept under regular review' and will be reviewed by its resources committee later this year. But grassroots GPs questioned the payments.

Dr Dermot Ryan, a GP in Loughborough, said: ‘I wonder how the GMC can justify this expense. The majority of membership of the GMC is now made up of people that are not doctors, who have little comprehension of medicine or the difficulty in providing medical services.'

'They seem to be going down the Government gravy train of awarding themselves luxuries that the people who provide their salaries can't afford themselves.'

‘I'm looking forward to the day when we have a vote of no confidence in the GMC.'

The issue was also flagged up on the social networking site Twitter by Dr Jonathan Tomlinson, a GP in Hackney, east London, and Dr Phil Hammond, a medical columnist and GP in Bristol.

‘Why does the GMC give its staff private medical cover?' asked Dr Hammond. ‘Is the NHS that bad? Are muggins doctors paying for it? Yes.'

A spokesperson for the GMC said the spending equated to just 0.7% of its full staffing costs.

‘Like many organisations, we offer a range of benefits to attract and retain staff,' she said. ‘Staff who make a claim pay an excess of £250 to keep costs at an acceptable level.'

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, GP Partner,
06 Jan 2012
money wasted !
Average (6Votes)
Top
Andrew Mcintosh, GP registrar,
06 Jan 2012
I'd like to say its unbelievable or something along those lines but unfortunately and rather depressingly, its not
Average (7Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Salaried GP,
06 Jan 2012
Doesn't really matter what the cost is as a proportion of the full staffing cost!. It simply cannot be justified, especially when members are paying such high membership fees. Most doctors/staff in NHS don't have private insurance and use the NHS. So, why shouldn't GMC staff do the same?! And if they think NHS service is so inferior, then they should pay for their private health insuracne from their own pocket NOT from ours.
Average (10Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
06 Jan 2012
The GMC urgently need to be referred to themselves, disciplined by themselves and then struck off by themselves. This organisation lacks credibility yet has the arrogance to harrass and intimdate doctors over their private lives.
THIS BEHAVIOUR IS BRINGING THE GMC INTO DISREPUTE.

GMC WEBSITE

We have five core organisational values which underpin everything we do:

We protect the public through the work that we do.
We treat everyone fairly.
We are honest and strive to be open and transparent.
We are committed to excellence in everything that we do.
We are a listening and learning organisation.

THEN START BLOODY WELL LISTENING AND LEARNING..............
Average (12Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Sessional/Locum GP,
06 Jan 2012
I still subscribe to GMC today because I am forced to.If I have the choice, it will be the first bill to be scrapped in my direct debits.To say that they fund private insurance for the staff to retain them is laughable.Majority of doctors whose subscriptions are used to run GMC have no private health insurance.The irony of it all is that one pays all these subscriptions for no other reasons than to be policed.In my opinion, GMC should be funded by the state.
Average (4Votes)
Top
Helen Bright, Other healthcare professional,
06 Jan 2012
The cost of the insurance cover does not appear to me to be very expensive per person but I do not know if all staff are treated equally. I do not know if some have more comprehensive policies than others.
Many people could afford private health cover if they decided to do so and this would include doctors and non-doctors.
GMC is a charity, it has tax advantages that both High Court and Court of Appeal would not agree to, but law was bypassed by Charity Commission allowing the registration. Anything is possible with the friends in the right places.
If the private insurance cover means that GMC staff are better able to do their work why not?
Of course, I am aware that GMC relentlessly persecuted, for example, locum doctors (majority are from ethnic minorities) as per policy, and caused major financial difficulties for many doctors who subsequently could not afford the basics for themselves or their families. lost their homes, were made bankrupt and yet never harmed anyone by GMC's own findings. One doctor slept on a park bench before a hearing as there was nowhere for doctor to stay in London. Yes, GMC caused a lot of misery.
Self-regulation does not work, but the concept is very dear to many doctors who are willfully blind to the suffering of the scapegoats within the profession.
In other words, what is the priority in regulation? Could it be justice ever?
Average (4Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Specialist registrar,
06 Jan 2012
The whole point of the GMC was professional 'self-regulation'. It is now populated with lay-people and run by the Government therefore it is no longer 'self-regulation' in any way or form.
Why does it need to exist? I wish a campaign could be started to make everyone refuse to pay. If 91.5 out of its 96.6 million funding comes from us, we should be able to bring it down.
Average (5Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP,
06 Jan 2012
The government says they have no money for our pensions. Well we have been squeezed, so can we now say "we don`t have the money to pay GMC and don`t want any regulation". If the people/Government of the country want an organization to regulate doctors then they should BLOODY WELL pay for it !
We are the only Turkeys voting (and paying) for Christmas!
If there is no GMC there is no revalidation. Their "If they cant have bread they can eat cakes" attitude that infuriates most doctors.
Average (5Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
06 Jan 2012
If we are paying for this service then we are the major stakeholders and we should definitely be allowed to vito money being spent in this way. I don't endorse private health insurance on a personal level for me or mine- we all rely on the NHS the majority of doctors keeping the GMC afloat work in the NHS not the private sector and I am sure we all want the public to know we have faith in the system which employs us. Some national newspapers could have a field day with this. More over how dare they waste our money when we are being squeezed ever harder to protect both NHS funds and (particularly in primary care accepting reduced incomes).
Average (4Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
07 Jan 2012
so much anger towards GMC! This system is dysfunctional and corrupt. We can not do anything. Its their money, and they can do anything with it. but my question is, why they need special insurance, why don't they trust normal GPs/NHS for their own health? we are created by them. They bark every day, like a mad dog, THAT they are protecting public, not Drs.
Average (2Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
07 Jan 2012
i have posted this link on watch dog website. Please do the same. click here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/watchdog/gotastory/
you do not have to tell your name, its Anonymous, just like our names on this web page. Please do it.
Average (2Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Salaried GP,
08 Jan 2012
All comments written above are appropriate,but nothing will change.We as doctors are the suppressed class and have no voice.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Nigel Dickson, GP Partner,
11 Jan 2012
Given current national economic situation and the fact that country can no longer afford to pay public service pensions without increasing contributions from members similarly GMC needs to make cuts. What the GMC thought was OK in 1997 offering its staff private health cover I'm sorry to say in 2012 that's no longer affordable and it will have to go as part of GMC's efforts to cut costs - like the rest of us who are facing increased pension contributions, increased taxation and shrinking incomes. GMC needs to be seen to be "fair" or is that just more NHS Alice in Wonderland thinking
Average (0Votes)
Top
Sunil Sapre, GP Partner,
11 Jan 2012
It is interesting that the GMC is alive and kicking because of members who are mostly employed in NHS.It seems GMC does not trust its members capability to look after its staffs health problem.GMC should carry out investigation regarding deficiencies of NHS Doctors inefficiency in looking after its staff. Where is the evidence that by not offering private health care GMC has staff recruitment and retention problem? What benefit GMC staff' 's family get by having a private insurance of one of the family member. I think GMC should do an honest soul searching on this issue and stop this benefit a.s.a.p. which most of us can not afford or do not have. I also wonder why most of the author's comments on this article are anonymous? Are they worried that they may called before the GMC for some silly reason if they speak up on this matter
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
11 Jan 2012
As a full time GP I cannot afford to pay for private health cover for myself and my family, so I am very angry that the GMC feel it is okay to use my money to fund this benefit for their employees.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Should GPs begin switching patients to atorvastatin immediately? Read the full story here

LATEST FORUM POSTS