This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 24 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Lawyers warn health bill amendments may do little to prevent postcode rationing

By alisdair stirling | 13 Feb 2012

Exclusive: Government amendments to the health bill will not prevent large disparities in the provision of care emerging across the country, say legal experts.

The 137 amendments announced by health secretary Andrew Lansley last week included a clearer directive to both clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and the health secretary to promote a ‘comprehensive health service'.

They were designed to counter criticism that the health bill would lead to postcode lotteries in the NHS, with national newspapers briefed that they would prevent controversial schemes denying treatment to patients because of their lifestyles.

But lawyers told Pulse the bill amendments would not prevent decisions, such as that taken by Herts Valley and East and North Herts CCGs, to withhold surgery from smokers and obese patients unless they agree to undertake weight loss or smoking cessation classes.

Ben Troke, a partner at Browne Jacobson said the amendments ‘might not make very much difference to CCGs on the ground'.

‘The promise of a "comprehensive health service has always been impossible to fulfil. What has been happening in Hertfordshire is exactly what the white paper envisaged – local decision making on the allocation of resources.'

He added: ‘It will be so easy for patients to throw mud in the water and cry ‘conflict of interest', so it will be vital CCGs refusing treatments can show their decision-making processes are sound.'

Ross Clarke, a partner and head of the corporate team at Hempson's solicitors, said: ‘The amendments are actually very clever in that they appear to address concerns but actually little is changed.'

Dr Mike Ingram, chair of the single-practice Red House Consortium and a member of Hertfordshire LMC, said: ‘Treating the individual is the art of general practice. It's the key to delivering the right level of care.'

‘If we´re going to do that, we need to avoid blanket restrictions and leave to up to individual GPs to make the decisions."

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, Other NHS,
13 Feb 2012
To speak in Valley, "Well, D'Uh!".

The bill is written in weasel, its been designed to fulfill a politcial ideology rather than actually make any beneficial changes to the current health system in England. If anything post code prescibing will get worse, not better, as the number of organisations making decisions regarding local priorities is increased.

Local prioritisation and Nation-wide equity of access are mutually exclusive concepts; All NHS purchasers over the last 20 years have been struggling with post-code prescribing (I've only been in for 20 years so can't comment before that), the bill fundamentally does not change the reasons behind it.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Will online booking ease the 8am rush?Read the full story here