Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NICE guidance must pass the ‘10-minute test’

  • Print
  • Comments (12)
  • Rate
  • Save

I recently watched a wonderful presentation by former RCGP president Dr Iona Heath on how ‘less is more’ in medicine. She made a powerful case that intervening less is often better for patients and doctors and I was reminded of this maxim when I came to write this editorial.

Less is most definitely more in the case of clinical guidelines, but this is a message the brains at NICE have yet to understand.

Today we look at the increasingly bizarre and impractical recommendations emerging from the institute. We make the bold claim that recent guidelines risk turning NICE into a ‘laughing stock’, rather than a respected source of tools for GPs to use in daily practice.

While the world around it tries to make life simpler and easier to navigate, NICE seems intent on making its guidelines more complex, less grounded in reality and – at times – almost comically out of touch.

Take the recent draft guidelines on diabetes, cancer and asthma. NICE’s decision to recommend repaglinide as an alternative to metformin was described as ‘bonkers’ by one prominent diabetes GPSI. The recent draft cancer guideline is hopelessly complicated, with table after table of symptoms and recommended actions for GPs. The latest guidance on asthma urges GPs to use a battery of tests to diagnose asthma – not all of which are routinely available in either primary or secondary care.

These are major clinical areas for primary care, and adherence to NICE guidance is a yardstick by which practices are measured, but the institute is issuing advice that is neither sensible nor practical.

Most patients do not have a neat single diagnosis, yet despite promises that NICE will address the issue of multimorbidity, GPs now have even more guidelines with reams of flow charts and bulleted lists to follow for individual disease areas.

Of course, NICE has always pushed boundaries and some of its recommendations will inevitably cause a stir. It has tried to include more GPs on guideline groups and its job is to look at the evidence and make recommendations; implementation is not its remit.

But NICE must consider the effect of its work on practices, particularly at a time when they are under such strain. What use is a guideline if it just ends up on a dusty shelf, rather than becoming an instrument for improving patient care?

NICE needs only to look to Scotland to see how to do it. SIGN has managed to chart a course between robustness and pragmatism that means its guidance is hardly ever met with the heated controversy so often seen south of the border.

There need to be far better incentives to ensure that more GPs are involved in forming guidelines. There should be a ‘rationalisation stage’ where a panel of GPs has the chance to go through a guideline and ensure any batty proposals are removed and that the whole thing passes the ‘10-minute consultation test’.

GPs’ views must be heeded at the consultation stage. The furore over the recent halving of the primary prevention threshold for statin treatment barely made a dent in the final guideline.

At that time, my predecessor invited NICE to come down from its ‘ivory tower’, but if anything, the institute has disappeared further up it.

I urge NICE to listen to GPs. Guidelines should be a help, not a hindrance, and NICE risks becoming a bad joke unless it revamps the advice is it giving.

Nigel Praities is editor of Pulse

Rate this blog  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (12)

  • Vinci Ho

    (1) In the beginning , a nightmare(austerity) dressed like a daydream(efficiency saving). (Love Taylor Swift's song!)
    (2) Then some politician buggers started to worry things could go horribly wrong.
    (3) The extreme paranoia and anxiety was forced down to all our 'experts' i.e. academics .
    (4) So, living inside their Ivory Tower , they are also constantly bombarbed by lightning sent down from higher up.
    (5) Of course , the monsters called pharmaceutical are constantly breathing behind their neck .
    My name is called conspiracy theorist , call me bloody anything,in fact!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nice guidance should be written on toilet paper then we could get some use out of them and flush them away.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent article Nigel.

    Add cystatin-C to your list of bonkers tests not yet available yet included in recent NICE CKD guidelines.

    Passing the 10 minute test is a really ingenious way of looking at things. The same sentiments are expressed by me to a variety of other HCPs as they deliver a 5 page summary on their pet subjects. eg - MUST scores. Everything must fit into a flow chart on one side of A4 - we don't have time to read any more!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And if a complaint is made the GMC / Ombudsman looks at the NICE 'guidance' and interprets this as expected GP standards of care!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I look at this whole 'climate' in a different angle:
    RCGP- controversies over CSA
    GMC- deaths during 'interrogations'
    CQC- remote intelligence to rate GP practices
    NICE- 'bonkers' recommendations

    Those, who are pro-establishment in the Ivory towers,are suffering from extreme paranoia that 'something horribly wrong is to happen everyday' . The solution is tougher and tougher over-regulation overstepping individualism .
    Perhaps this kind of mentality is still logical under a global climate of a war on terror. But we are talking about NHS particularly general practice which is seriously underfunded here. Without serious committment to address the real source of the crisis , these short sighted , heavy handed and top to bottom impositions will jeopardise even the fundamentals of NHS.
    This forthcoming General Election is all about left against right , exactly the same channel as individualism against pro-establishment ........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Left agains Right, both colours are as barmy as one another,we are doomed who ever gets in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I thought the '10 minute test was going to be that guidance should be readable and able to be understood in 10 minutes. This should also apply.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I take repaglinide, have done so for nearly 8 years. No side effects. You have more control over glycaemic levels with it as, if you eat a meal very low in carbohydrate you don't take the repaglinide, if you eat a meal higher in carbs you take the repaglinide just before the meal. Simple. Of course you have to assume patients are responsible which is something some medical professionals have problems with.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GMC MPTS should also get resilience training fromtaking NHS's accussations against doctors ,without examining the facts and putting GPs to non costeffective assesments.
    How much of our national wealth and skills shall we throw down the drain

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Repaglinide may have no sideefects but does not prevent metabolic consequences of diabetes IHD,Amputations ,CVA due to weight increase which Dapaglizone does.Diabetes kills predominantly by silkent MIs CVas Renal failure,Amuations

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (12)
  • Rate
  • Save