Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Non-principal jobs looking attractive

The proposals do nothing to encourage existing locums, GPRs or newly-qualified doctors to become GP principals.

My practice's regular locums have told me exactly that. Their reasons are surely echoed by the majority of non-principals. They would continue to earn a comparable income to principals with less effort and responsibility plus more flexibility.

It is clear that GP principal incomes will not rise much over the next two years and, after the Carr-Hill debacle, far from certain that 2005/6 will bring substantial rises. It is also obvious that practice workload will not improve.

The contract is a least as complicated as the Red Book with no limit on list sizes and little change in allocations.

The short-term upshot of a likely No vote will be an increase in PMS applications and piecemeal introduction of the contract proposals negotiated at a local level. It will remain difficult to recruit partners.

Non-principals will only be attracted to partnerships when our jobs seem more attractive than theirs. The reverse would continue under the new contract.

Dr John Couch

Ashford

Middlesex

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say