Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Oh great, another brilliant but completely unworkable idea

  • Print
  • Comments (9)
  • Rate
  • Save

I did enjoy the Guardian’s take on the BMA’s ‘Safe working in general practice’ document. Apparently, one of the reasons we’d like 15 minute appointments is because the population is increasingly overweight – and, yes, it is time-consuming jimmying them through the average consulting room door.

This idea is brilliant, elegant and potentially transformative. Oh, and utterly unworkable

Otherwise, though, the coverage was skull-bangingly exasperating, focusing, as it did, on the BMA’s call for GPs to have 15 minute appointments. After all, this simply gave an NHS spokesman the opportunity to say, ‘Durr, it’s up to GPs what appointment lengths they offer, dumbasses’, or words to that effect, thereby closing the story and ensuring the point was missed.

And that point is the fact that this is, of course, about workload, and therefore safety. Which the BMA did consider, at length, and proposes to solve with the use of locality hubs. This idea – to contractually define how many appointments GPs can reasonably be expected to cope with per day, and to divert any overspill to local multidisciplinary hubs – is brilliant, elegant and potentially transformative. Oh, and utterly unworkable. Here’s why:

1. Why would the Government agree to change a system which currently means they can dump as much faeculent matter on us, from an altitude of their choosing, at no cost, and at great amusement, to themselves?

2. Where would the funding come from? Answer: from us, rather defeating the object. And if not from us, then from some of the various illusory pots of money currently appearing like Pokemon Go characters – which, if it ever materialised, would merely be ‘pump-priming’ before the dosh is topsliced from some other budget intended for GPs. In other words, from us.

3. Who will staff these hubs? We will. Let’s think, now. That takes us out of our surgeries, thereby reducing workforce, thereby leaving fewer GPs to cope with the same demand, thereby busting the contractual requirement to have a sensible ceiling of consultations per GP per day, which was the original purpose of the scheme. Arse.

4. What’s to stop us gaming? No, we’d never do that. We never did it with health promotion clinics and we’ve never done it with QOF, obvs. But the temptation to bring back the odd patient for a totally unnecessary review, thereby blocking the few appointments I have remaining and enabling me to glide through surgery on autodoc might be overwhelming, and impossible to police.

5. What happens when the hub is full? The patients go to A&E? And what happens when A&E make the same contractual demands, and A&E is full? The patients, presumably, get sucked into a massive black hole, never to be seen again.

Because that, ultimately, is what all this is about. Patient demand is insatiable. Ideas like hubs are superficially attractive but simply shift the problem onto someone else, who can then make the same case. I don’t have any solution other than a population lobotomy to change illness behaviour. And, to be honest, the Government is more likely to accept that than what’s currently on the table.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield

Rate this blog  (4.9 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (9)

  • Yes, a population lobotomy. Or £5 for routine GP appointment, £15 for emmergency and £50 for home visit. This will quickly control the demand.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This will of course cause more problems, as they willbe seen by noctors, who have no training or ability to make an assessment, who will ring the surgery for a same day appointment (why ask the non existent doctor next door) demanding they are seen by someone with a degree. "But we have reached our safe limit" will be the answer. So of to A+e, who will do nothing and say "see your GP tomorrow for a referral". And the circle continues....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doesn't need to be £5 for an appointment. Look what 5p charge did for carrier bags. How about £1 booking fee to contact GP, 111 or for any NHS appointment?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Value yourselves, €50 in Ireland for an appointment, approx £150-200 for a private home visit in UK if you google it etc etc. Let's see how much we really are worth for every consultation, taking responsibility for a result, actioning a letter, writing a report with your signature on it etc and then work out how to pay of it. If it is another £150 billion per year needed then let's decide how much responsibility the public will suddenly have to take for a 5 second cough or how the "all you can eat NHS" is going to continue to service everyone's WANTS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 20 - 30$ co-payment from patient for routine appointment in Australian general practice - certainly sorts the wheat from the chaff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No politician is ever going to bring in payments for GP appointments or home visits as it is an automatic vote loser and the sacred cow of free at the point of use would be killed. However when we are now virtually run as a one party state, Labour being in hopeless meltdown, why not give it a go!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ' I don’t have any solution other than a population lobotomy to change illness behaviour.'

    Er the same solution that stops you going into a late night Tesco, filling your shopping trolley with life saving food and walking out without paying - having to pay for things

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do you think the income from charging fees will be more or less than the value that the contract would be cut by?

    I'm going to guess.... it will be less.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes more artificial schemery which will result in poorer continuity of care with wasteful duplications like the ludicrous weekend routine service
    More feeble fiddling while Rome burns
    Quite pathetic
    More GPS less bureaucratic bullshit please

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (9)
  • Rate
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder