This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Once Jeremy's done with hospital doctors, GPs will be next in line for 'aggressive negotiations'

  • Print
  • 4
  • Rate
  • Save

Call me a paranoid catastrophist, but I reckon there could be a connection between two recent news stories – one on case management à la Unplanned Admissions DES and the other involving Jezza getting tough on hospital seven-day working.

So. The first one. Who’d a thunk it - producing care plans doesn’t seem to reduce mortality, admissions or costs? But it does improve, by just a teensy, weensy bit, patient satisfaction. Which you or I could have told the researchers, given that we all know this exercise in futility succeeds only in eroding our time/souls while generating a ripple of positive feedback from punters who like the idea of us, er, ‘caring’.

Now, if I was a politician, this would make me think that all that funding we’re ploughing into the Unplanned Admissions DES is starting to sound like a waste of money. On the other hand, it’s a cool PR exercise, so if only we could get those pesky GPs to do it for free… Oh yeah, we can. We just make it a contractual obligation.

Which leaves a whole heap of ex-QOF/new DES money to be re-earned in some other way. And that leads us to the second story. Because you can bet that, after hospital doctors, we GPs will be next in line for some aggressive negotiating, aka an imposed contract, to achieve a seven-day service. And the funding for this will come from…ah, you’re ahead of me. Twice recycled money which will be trumpeted as carrot rather than stick.

Yes, this does sound a bit like psychotic pessimism, but when you’ve repeatedly been on the receiving end of malevolent governmental sleight-of-hand, it’s the only rational response. So if you’re not a paranoid catastrophist, too, you must be mad. Or working for them.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield              

Rate this blog  (4.95 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (4)

  • Of course....i think the narrative is....make the workforce who cant even cope with 5 days do 7 days.....public outcry follows regards lower quality / lack of continuity, .........then once again appear as the conquering hero by bringing in private health to cover for those 'deficiencies'. we are so thick as GPs...they (Conbservatives)are 100 steps ahead in their scheming, not 'a' step ahead.
    Can someone set up an undated mass resignation letter please for us ALL to sign as a show of solidarity etc ( even though obviously wouldnt be taken seriously , but would nevertheless get some coverage !)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • so funny. they can only get you do do these things by asking you. If you say no then that's it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 0:42am-clearly not a GP.
    Is that your relationship with your boss then?
    Do you say no when he asks you to do something?
    It must be a luxury to not have to pay a mortgage, run a car or feed your family eh??
    Last one out, turn off the lights!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You seem to miss the point - the object is to make the national contract so unattractive that we will clamour for local resolution. We will give up our right to a lifetime contract in order to survive in the short term. This will put us on the same level playing field as every other private provider and it is a slippery slope from there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • 4
  • Rate
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder