This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

'Overwhelming' case for aortic aneurysm screening

Regarding the story headed 'GPs cost less than nurse practitioners' (News, July 23),

I work as a nurse practitioner in a busy general practice and get paid much less than any GP.

I was trained by my GP colleagues to deal with minor illness in 1993 and have been doing so successfully for many years.

I have proved through audit that I prescribe much less than a GP for minor illness conditions, and I consult at seven-and-a-half minute appointments, seeing about 100 patients a week.

I do telephone triage every morning, releasing a GP to do surgery. I deal with up to 30 calls each day, triaging to either myself or a GP colleague.

I deal with whatever comes in on the phone. I also work out of hours, which has also been proven to be cost-effective.

I can see up to 75 per cent of what comes through the doors without any GP involvement and I get paid a fraction of what the doctor gets.

The statement that 'nurses take two to three times longer because of their lack of expertise' is definitely claptrap.

I have worked extremely hard to get to the position I am in. I work full time, I have done a BA in general practice nursing and have prescribing, family planning, and minor illness certificates. I also teach nurses and paramedics.

I am sure many of my nurse practitioner colleagues have done the same.

Liz Cook



Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say