This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Hancock hints indemnity scheme could be paid for with GP core funding

Exclusive Health secretary Matt Hancock has hinted the state-backed indemnity scheme - due to start in April - could be funded using GP core funding.

Speaking to Pulse, Mr Hancock said his priority was stopping the cost of indemnity from spiraling ever higher, but when questioned on funding he said the ‘costs have to fall somewhere’.

NHS England is looking at where the money for the long-awaited scheme will come from, as part of the next GP contract negotiations, he explained.

Asked whether the state-backed indemnity scheme will come out of GP core funding, Mr Hancock told Pulse: ‘Clearly the costs of indemnity have been rising sharply.’

‘Those costs have to fall somewhere. And our goal is to stop the rise in those costs and I very much hope that we can support GPs in making sure that system works far better in the future,’ he said.

Mr Hancock continued: ‘The exact nature of the future, where the future liabilities, where the cost of it sits as opposed to the risk, is tied to the negotiations around the GP contract.'

‘NHS England is leading on that,’ he added.

An NHS England spokesperson said: ‘NHS England is supportive of the Government’s proposal for a state-backed indemnity scheme for GPs and is working closely with Department for Health and Social Care on its implementation.’

The BMA said it could not comment on the indemnity scheme, including the issue of funding, as negotiations were ongoing.

Readers' comments (36)

  • National Hopeless Service

    So I wont be paying for it by paying for it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps it could come from the spiralling costs in secondary care?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One can feel a further pay cut coming on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let common sense prevail

    I've just had a letter from MPS stating that I will still need a policy with them when the state scheme commences. No surprise there, but they go on to state that I 'may be entitled to a discount' because of the state scheme. Am I paranoid in thinking that I will continue to pay several thousand pounds a year for my own policy, and have a similar some deducted from my own income through a reduction in GP core funding?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THIS GUY HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUES.

    SO INSTEAD OF GP PARTNERS JUST PAYING FOR THEIR OWN MEDICAL INDEMNITY THE IDEA IS THAT THEY PAY THE INDEMNITY FOR OVERPAID LOCUMS TOO.....GENIUS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • WHY CAN'T THE COSTS FALL ON THOSE WHO EARN THE MOST RATHER THAN GP PARTNERS WHO ON AN HOURLY RATE EARN THE LEAST.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I knew something like this is going to happen.All the 5 year forward view BS.
    You wonder why GPs do not trust the government. They have increased our risks so much and caused the rising costs and now this! Nope, I am not going to help anymore.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope he realises how vital this issue is. One of the only things keeping me in partnership is this idea of state backed indemnity. If it turns out to be BS ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I LOVE THE WAY THE REPORTS SAYS "HINTS"..HOW DEROGATORY AND INSULTING THAT WE MUST ALL HANG ON THE EVERY WORD OF A "FOOL".

    WELL I WOULD LIKE TO "HINT" THAT THIS MAN IS "MASSIVELY OUT OF HIS DEPTH" AND "HINT" THAT HE SHOULD BE "FIRED"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ‘You couldn’t make it up’ or ‘totally predictable’?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say