This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

How can we avoid a grim future for general practice?

Dr David Wrigley urges GPs to support organisations in their fight against threats to NHS general practice

41 dr david wrigley power50 2016

Our NHS has been the envy of the world and a major factor has been the work of the GP, responsible for 90% of patient contacts, loved by patients and valued by professional colleagues.

To most people they represent the most accessible part of the NHS providing expert services with care and compassion. To specialists and managers they have been essential to the success of the health service by identifying patients who need specialist care, enabling the hospital service to function with fewer resources than comparable countries.

One of the key strengths is that GPs know their patients and the background knowledge and experience is highly valuable in assessing patients who present with a new problem. Every specialist knows the value of the past history and the time it can take to record it – for the traditional GP it’s in their memory already.

Managers have focused on the efficiency of the GP by planning to move more services out of hospital and into the community with inadequate funds following the patient. Many GPs now say their services are unsafe.

Patients may no longer have ‘their’ GP but will be allocated to a healthcare professional on the basis of their symptoms

And it’s likely to get worse. There are at least two substantial threats to the traditional and successful GP service – Accountable Care Organisations (ACOs) and online based GP alternatives.

ACOs operate in America, where one organisation contracts health services for the local population. In the UK, we have less money to spend and it is unclear how they will be accountable, what the quality of care will be and who will organise them – most probably accountants to ensure the books balance. Balancing the books means rationing services, by how much we have yet to learn but it will keep solicitors and accountants busy as they may operate under company law.

One feature is that patients may no longer have ‘their’ GP. They will be allocated to a healthcare professional on the basis of their symptoms – destroying the continuity of care vital to high quality GP work and in reducing hospital referrals. Large corporations will be circling like vultures around these huge contracts whereby they will seek to extract as much profit from them as possible.

Labour has now laid an Early Day Motion calling for a Parliamentary debate on proposed legislative changes to introduce ACOs. Without this, the changes could be slipped through Parliament with little scrutiny, risking a further lack of accountability in this whole process.

Of note, prominent health professionals including Professor Allyson Pollock have just launched a crowdfunding website to help get financial support for their bid to take Jeremy Hunt and his government to the High Court and challenge the imposition of ACOs without proper consultation or full Parliamentary scrutiny. This legal action has already caused alarm in Whitehall with government lawyers sharpening their pencils for the battle ahead. As Professor Pollock says: ‘This will be a big fight. We will not get the NHS back unless and until Parliament acts.’

We see other big changes ahead with ‘online’ GP services proliferating – we are becoming used to IT helping us in our daily tasks but we also know the problems they present. We now hear of apps to help you contact a GP – but at a price. If patients register with one of these services they are removed from the list at their own surgery. Through reducing the previous surgery income they threaten the viability of that practice providing comprehensive care. In return patients will have an app which gets them some limited services but not if they are elderly, have a chronic condition or mental health issues. Surprisingly, the very patients that keep GPs busy.

Who is standing up for GPs who wish to assert the value of their services? Doctors for the NHS believes in the founding principles of the NHS and campaigns for a high quality, publicly accountable, publicly funded and publicly provided service. We work with other non-political campaigners such as Keep Our NHS Public and Health Campaigns Together. We welcome GPs to join us to help in our work in meeting with politicians to change policies that threaten the NHS. It is vital we act as one profession in standing up for what we believe is right for our patients.

Dr David Wrigley is a GP in Carnforth, Lancashire


Rate this article  (3.08 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (11)

  • If GPs are so great, why not allow patients to pay some money to see them without forgoing the access to the NHS scripts, investigations and referrals that they have paid for in tax many times over?
    Or are we great but not that great that patients would actually pay?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a member of the BMA coucil,you lot should have acted a year or 2 ago and not have precided over the collpase .The BMA heirachy has let the profession down.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Wrigley

    Dear 'turn out the lights' - I (and many others) have been campaigning on privatisation/underfunding for years and I have even written a book about it - NHS for Sale - available from all good book stockists.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ACSs are designed for stakeholders to work together and share the finite (whichever government) money and human resources most wisely for the benefit of the patient and system sustainability (including general practice)...what's your better idea?

    Online is coming King Canute...use your influence to position it for maximum benefit to staff workload and patients

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • " has been the envy of the world ...."

    Past tense, if ever. Do you wonder why nobody imitates the system?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Envy of the Third World perhaps.A system where demand is unlimited and in many cases now driven by unwise lifestyle choices is unsustainable.The weary old record of “privatisation “ should be turned off.What we need is an intelligent debate about how a system invented in 1949 largely to deal with infectious diseases can be adapted for the 21st century. We also need the humility to learn from other European systems, and having recently visited primary care in a run down area of the USA, delivering excellent care to a deprived population,we should abandon the doctrinaire party line that presumes anything in America is evil.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A quick search on Google will show Dr Wrigley's other career, as a would-be politician on the Left of the Labour party. Perhaps he should declare his interests in future, for the sake of honesty and transparency?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Recent Telegraph opinion article: solution to NHS problems is getting rid of GPs............

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couldn't agree more with Robin Jackson's comment.

    In general the political left are more 'pro Europe' than anyone else yet this seems to stop at health, despite the lower risk of death for many conditions in many mixed payer European schemes.

    Unfortunately the UK NHS is only ever compared to the worst parts of the USA or 1949, not modern day Europe or other developed countries.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To avoid the grim future young enterprising doctors should upskill and diversify. Do not under any circumstances believe that GP is going to get better. It isn't.
    However well meaning characters like this who "even wrote a book" (fat lot of good that did btw) they are elderly voices crying out in the wilderness as modern times crush them..
    The future is worker ants bullied by managers driven by the bottom line. The only hope now for any professional self respect is through the private route. I have huge respect for Professor Pollock ( a proper professor ) but even if they get a judicial review this will be at best a minor rate limiting step.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say