Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Joint chair candidates pledge to rethink GPC's 'fighting and resistance' approach

Two leading female GPs have declared their joint candidacy to be the next GPC chair - and have promised a change of tack in negotiations to move away from what they described as the GPC’s current ‘fighting and resistance’ strategy.

Londonwide LMC chair Dr Michelle Drage, a former GPC negotiatior, and West Midlands GPC representative Dr Fay Wilson, a former chair of the LMCs conference, announced today they will be standing as joint candidates. They join GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey and negotiators Dr Chaand Nagpaul and Dr Dean Marshall as contenders for the role which will be vacated by Dr Laurence Buckman in two weeks’ time.

Nominations for the vacancy close tomorrow and the new chair will be elected by a vote of GPC members at its next meeting.

The joint candidates told Pulse that the GPC’s approach in recent years had failed to secure real gains for GPs.

Dr Wilson said: ‘The approach we have at the moment, and the last few years, has been one of fighting a war of attrition and of trying to prevent a chipping away. We are looking at whether we can leapfrog over that.’

‘We’ve both done quite a lot of negotiating in the past and one of the issues is trying to find out where the other side is trying to get to and help them to help you. We want to make gains and not just prevent a chipping away. It’s a fundamentally different approach to saying “we are going to fight to defend”.’

She added: ‘If you start off with an agenda that “we are going to fight”, then you are committed to fighting. We are going to solve problems.’

Dr Drage said she expected the Government to listen to a new approach because it is ‘desperate’ - and insisted the new strategy would not involve more compromise.

‘We are trying to focus on the bigger picture and not just about the contract as it was,’ she said. It’s about the future of general practice, engagement with the LMCs and making sure that everyone understands what general practice is about and gets the support it deserves rather than years focusing on the minutiae. It’s not about a future of compromise, it’s about the future of general practice.’

The joint candidacy comes after recent criticism of the lack of female representation on the GPC negotiating team, with the LMCs conference voting in May in favour of a full investigation into why none of the seven UK-wide negotiators at the time were women. However earlier this week Dr Charlotte Jones was elected as chair of GPC Wales, ensuring there will be at least one female negotiator when the new team takes over later this month.

Readers' comments (10)

  • " because it is ‘desperate’" - I havent noticed any desperation??????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So they plan to sell GPs out then.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Mmmmm
    Make the election a bit more spicy
    Different ethos to be welcome
    Let's see how members will vote
    At the end of the day , it is about what you believe is the 'truth',mate.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    The only other thing is:
    It never worked out with Liverpool football club in 1998 when Gerrard Houlier and Roy Evans had a joint partnership as the manager of LFC.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Two leading female GPs have declared their joint candidacy to be the next GPC chair..." Why the need to qualify this editorial with the word 'female'? Bigotry is alive and well at Pulse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Anonymous 3.12pm

    Thanks for your comment - that very point did prompt some debate during the editing process. It certainly wasn't intended to be any kind of bigotry.

    However given the context of the GPC being heavily criticised for having an all-male negotiating team - context which is fully explained in the last paragraph of the story - it did seem a relevant detail to include.

    Steve Nowottny
    Editor, Pulse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • they dont fight enough - does this mean they are to roll over to everything Government dictates - that is the exact OPPOSITE of what is currently required !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • These two GPs seem to be very experienced when it comes to negotiating and chairing conferences.
    Why can't I get the old game of musical chairs as played at parties out of my head?
    Did anyone else use to watch the chuckle brothers?
    To me ... to you. .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We need a change. Lawrence Buckman, while an entertaining speaker, has been a complete disaster and through his grandstanding and inability to forge relationships with DH officials, has delivered lower rescources to primary care and multiple anti-GP headlines.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well my vote as well as I appeal to all the other GPC members to vote and wholeheartedly support the joint candidacy of Dr Wilson & Dr Dragge,because ,I believe both of them have shown their exemplary fighting qualities to safeguard our rights from a fair platform!
    The other candidates Dr Marshall & Dr Nagpaul are well known ,because of their contribution as a part of the dysfunctional Buckman Team!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say