Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Number of area teams 'to be halved' under draft plans to cut costs

Exclusive NHS England is proposing to cut the number of area teams by merging them into ‘much bigger’ structures, prompting fears the move could cause ‘inevitable chaos’ for GP practices, Pulse can reveal.

The mergers could see a reduction in the 25 area teams - currently in charge of GP commissioning - as part of possible changes to the structure of NHS England which are currently under discussion by senior managers, Pulse understands.

GP leaders expressed concerns that the move could lead to a further loss in experience across NHS England employees, resulting in more confusion for GPs about who they should be contacting and creating bigger distances between practices and their commissioners.

Area teams have struggled to pay practices in the past because of chaos behind the scenes at NHS England, Pulse has reported, with some GPs left confused by the way payments and reimbursements were being allocated following the abolition of PCTs last year.

A GP leader, who has been briefed recently on plans by an NHS England official, told Pulse: ‘There is a review of the area team footprint going on. There was a correspondence that came out on Monday to very senior managers within the area teams, and we understand that there is going to be some mergers of area teams which we have all been expecting. I suspect that you will see a reduction of area teams of between 25-50%.’

GPC negotiator Dr Beth McCarron-Nash confirmed that she had also heard the same details. ‘That is right, the area teams are getting much bigger,’ she said.

Some GPs also raised concerns that bigger area teams may lead to bigger CCGs in future, as area teams struggled to manage many small structures.

Dr John Canning, secretary of Cleveland LMC said he expected area teams will become ‘much, much, much bigger’, ‘perhaps to the level of previous regions, which were 14 traditionally but came to seven at one stage in the past’.

He said: ‘It will create greater distances from the activity. [I wonder] will they be able to manage more CCGs or will it lead to wanted and perhaps unwanted CCG mergers.’

GP leaders, including the BMA, raised concerns last year that the reduced number of staff in the local area teams compared with their PCT predecessors would risk the development of strong relationships between practices, LMCs and the commissioning bodies, which hold GPs’ contracts.

And Birmingham LMC executive secretary Dr Robert Morley said this week that the latest move could lead to further loss of ‘corporate memory’ since the PCT days.

He said: ‘The biggest issue is the inevitable chaos it will cause for practices not knowing who to deal with, new people in jobs, loss of corporate memory etc. It’s just more of the same and things get worse each time. The changes also cycle round ever more quickly and this one will be compounded by the privatisation of primary care support functions, the move to co-commissioning and possible CCG mergers too.’

Dr Tracey Vell, honorary secretary of Manchester LMC, said: ‘As we see it the staff were already thin on the ground at senior level and this may become thinner as the senior staff are merging.’

Kent LMC chair Dr Julian Spinks said: ‘My LMC has built a very good working relationship with our area team so it would be sad if we had to start all over again with yet another new structure.’

A letter sent to all NHS England staff from chief executive Simon Stevens last week (Friday 5 September) said the review of area teams ‘to be frank, is principally driven by the running cost cuts we are facing’.

An NHS England spokesperson told Pulse: ‘Discussions around possible future organisational changes across NHS England are ongoing. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.’

 

Pulse September survey

Samsung HD TV - win - online

Take Pulse’s September survey and have the chance to win a Samsung Smart HD TV. This survey should take just a couple of minutes to complete, and will help Pulse gain a vital insight into the views of the profession. 

 

 

 

 

 

Readers' comments (13)

  • more restructuring.

    I guess Jeremy Hunt finished his game of golf early then?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps this also might be the realisation that micromanagement and associated mad levels of GP bureaucracy serves no purpose other than jobs for the boys.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surprise surprise are we returning to the days of the SHA!
    Soon we will completely this merry go round again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • here we go again - the writing was on the wall and anywhay should have been done first time round - ATs are PCTs by another name.....and stil spending vast amounts of cash doing what????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ha ha ha -> back to PCT sized units BUT with infrastructure and legislation to push privitisation.

    can't make it up !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Actually back to SHA sized units, while they're at it, perhaps they could rename CCGs "Practice Commissioning Groups" and when the inevitable "economies of scale" force CCG/PCG mergers, we could then call them PCTs, or Primary care Trusts, as they develop co-commissioning.
    So several hundreds of millions of pounds disappear into administrative changes, lots more millions spent on redundancies for managers who will be re-employed within months, and we end up back where we were years ago, still with dysfunctional NHS management, still without enough clinicians, and still without enough resource allocation to provide even the basic stuff we were able to do 5-10 years ago, and they wonder why there is a morale and recruitment problem in Primary Care?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS England wenforcing Suphonylyeas as 2nd line treatment In Diaetes according to Prof Anthony Barnet is not a good idea.He states it frequently causes hypos which can cost hundreds to thousand of pounds to treat each case.Pluds Diabetologia magazine mentions in 2007 hypoglycaemia studt the incidence in first three years of use c causes hypos similar to Insulin

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    Mustafa Old Chap

    You cut and paste the same thing about diabetes on every Pulse story. What's the deal?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You could at least get the spelling right after all the reprints!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Private GP | 12 September 2014 5:44pm

    I know it's got nothing to do with the article written ... But i'm sure colleagues would like to know more about these problems with diabetic treatment that you have briefly mentionned.

    In fact your ideas seem more plausible than the ideas that come out of NHSE !

    Perhaps Pulse can run a story on it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.