This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

What is Jeremy Hunt’s game plan?

The health secretary has dealt with the juniors, now it is GPs’ turn, finds Nigel Praities

Jeremy Hunt SUO

Whatever you might think of Jeremy Hunt, he is a masterful politician. The Teflon minister has overcome stiff odds and in three months will become the longest-serving health secretary ever. But he has also become one of the least popular.

Last month saw a nadir in his relations with the medical profession, with the imposition of a contract on junior doctors eroding any remaining goodwill among doctors.

This followed months of missed targets in A&E and a ‘new deal’ for GPs that blew up in his face. Meanwhile, the whole health service is facing financial meltdown, with trusts running up multimillion-pound deficits and scores of GP practices closing.

A YouGov poll revealed that his public approval rating sunk in the wake of the contract imposition, with just 17% of voters saying he is doing a good job, compared with 65% who think he is doing a poor job. A recent petition calling for his resignation garnered 250,000 signatures.

The very reason Mr Hunt was parachuted in from the culture department in 2012 was to take the health service off the front pages before the general election – and, as such, he was not expected to stay for long.

But following the installation of a Tory majority government, he has been let off the leash and looks more secure in his post than ever.

Not only is he still in post, he is already turning his attention away from junior doctors and refocusing on GPs, promising a new ‘package’ that is set to reform general practice far more than the recently concluded GMS contract negotiations.

One of the reasons he has been given such licence by his boss is that – as one of the shrewdest operators in the Cabinet – he actually has a game plan to deliver promises made in the Conservative party’s 2015 election manifesto.


The manifesto promised a ‘truly seven-day NHS’, parity for mental health and 5,000 new GPs by 2020. For most, that would prove an impossible wishlist. But Mr Hunt seems impervious to the naysayers.

The elements of this game plan have a common theme – powerful and populist pledges to patients, announced in grandiose style, yet ultimately left to commissioners and medics to deliver.

The deal is the start of significant new investment

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt 

The release last month of a new Mental Health Taskforce report was an attempt to establish parity with physical health – yet the buck has been passed to commissioners to find the £1bn of ‘new funding’ to implement the report’s recommendations. 

Meanwhile, the health secretary may have toughed it out with the contract imposition – but it is trusts and junior doctors who are left to draw up weekend rotas in secondary care with strained relationships and no extra funding.

So that just leaves the traditional ‘awkward squad’ – GPs.

But, like the arch-politician he is, Mr Hunt has adapted his tactics and is putting some money where his mouth is.

The new GP contract – announced last month – gives an indication of the direction of travel. After nearly a decade of pay cuts, a £220m funding uplift represents a significant investment of cash into general practice.

For the first time, the contract includes a detailed assessment of rising practice costs for indemnity fees, national insurance, employer superannuation increases and running expenses.

Some of the extra funding will be eaten up by the massive hike in CQC fees, and the whole deal does little to reverse nearly a decade of cuts, but the 3.2% uplift is expected by accountants to deliver a 1% pay uplift for partners – the first income increase for seven years.

And Mr Hunt says ‘this deal is just the start of significant new investment’. General practice has been promised year-on-year funding increases of 4-5% until 2020. Negotiations continue on a new ‘package’ of measures to take the pressure off general practice, thought to be worth around £110m.

This is designed to ‘maintain the profession as the jewel in the crown of our NHS’ and fulfil Mr Hunt’s promise of more new GPs and 10,000 other professionals – such as pharmacists and physician associates – working in general practice.

gp pay graph 580x619px

Smoke and mirrors

Pulse has learned the announcement – planned for February but delayed until next month because of the junior doctors – is expected to contain details of a much-delayed refresh of the GP retainer scheme designed to defuse the looming retirement timebomb. It will also trumpet the release of more than

100 ‘golden hellos’ to tempt GP trainees to work in areas with low levels of training recruitment, such as Lincolnshire, Blackpool, the Lake District and Isle of Wight, as revealed by Pulse last month.

The majority of the money has been used to bail out cash-strapped trusts 

Also, there is also likely to be an extension of the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund, which pump-primes seven-day GP access schemes. Some 57 pilots covering 18 million patients have already been launched – although Pulse has revealed that almost half of those in first wave have already reduced their opening hours due to lack of demand.

All of this will feed into the new voluntary GP contract that is being worked on behind the scenes for 2017. This will be restricted to groups of practices covering at least 30,000 patients and will provide routine seven-day GP access and more specialist services in the community, as envisioned by NHS England’s Five Year Forward View.

But, of course, as might be expected from the master tactician, Mr Hunt’s game plan contains a lot of smoke and mirrors.

The insistence from him and NHS England that they were pumping more money into primary care has been undermined by the fact that the actual proportion of NHS funding devoted to primary care has decreased this year from 7.31% to 7.23%.

The majority of extra funding (£1.8bn) has been used to bail out cash-strapped hospitals. As a result, there is unlikely to be enough money for primary care to carry out what the health secretary is expected to announce in his package. Pulse understands from insiders that the GPC has said £500m will be needed – almost five times the amount actually on offer.

And, in the long run, it might be that this very game plan – and the further distrust that it is likely to bring – turns out to be Mr Hunt’s undoing.

The protracted contract fight with the juniors has been ill advised and has managed to unite the – famously riven – medical profession in opposition against him.

The juniors’ resistance to being bullied into acceptance was – in part – behind the vote at the recent Special LMC Conference to consider mass resignation in six months by GP leaders, whose ultimatum to the Government is unlikely to be met by an underfunded ‘rescue package’.

Before then, cuts to PMS payments will kick in, and will see many more practices suddenly lose large chunks of their funding from April. Many of these will have to cut services, and some may be forced to close altogether.

Crisis worsens

Meanwhile, the GP recruitment crisis continues to worsen, with Health Education England’s campaign to attract medical graduates to general practice failing spectacularly last year, with round one applications for August 2016 falling by 5% to a record low.

And the NHS pension scheme changes that will come into force from April are likely to contribute to the brain drain of older GPs retiring or reducing their working hours.

So the famously lucky health secretary’s game plan hangs in the balance. These next three months are going to test his resilience and may well be decisive in determining his legacy.


Rate this article  (4.48 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (14)

  • Vinci Ho

    All you need is one referendum to turn politicians in government into bonkers(or even zombies breaking out of hell mouth!).
    Only a couple of weeks down the road , the bloodshed and organ spillage are all over the place. The funny hair-styled Mayor spared no time to blend the dismissal of the director-general of British Chambers of Commerce (BCC, not basal cell carcinoma ) as 'scandalous'. Ozzy is so petrified of upsetting his 'leave' camp party fellows that he U-turned(another U turn) on his contentious plan of pension overhaul. And more will come. It is not about what is right or wrong but all down to a internal civil war within the tribe.

    The truth is this democratic ballot carries a far reaching meaning underneath: the Cameron's government to survive or a even more far right one(Johnson/Gove/IDS etc) to replace it.
    Indeed, when you look back to the drama in May last year . Cameron knew extremely well the weaknesses of his position in his party and the only way to have a chance to win the election was to package the party as 'middle to the right' while his far right backbenchers were always ready to overthrow him. EU referendum was a tactic for this re-packaging. Perhaps , Labour lost the campaign for being desperate to move from middle to far left in the dying moments before the general election.
    As I said in the past , history rewrote itself many times during economic downturn when far right ideology tried to creep back into mainstream . The US presidential candidate internal election of the Republican tells the tale. What Cameron had slightly miscalculated was the level of opposition against him inside the party.Middle ground politics does not appear to be the norm for his party.One can argue that this split is only issue specific rather outright mutiny but the political reality is whether Cameron and his mates will be still in power after 23/6. He NEEEDS these 'in' votes.
    Of course , one person watching very closed on this Cameron Vs Johnson match is the Chancellor . He set his target to be the PM the day he declared reaching economic surplus in 2020 but his reputation has been consistently declining . His strategies on the economy have not really worked out and he is asking more austerity in public sector . Being the fifth largest economy in the world , UK relies on service sector for over 70% of its GDP. But Ozzy decided to put all the effort on manufacturing instead and as somebody suggested on this platform before , no economy could starve itself back to positive growth by strict austerity. Small to medium sized business and hence , middle class , was squeezed and disappearing on the horizon . Only big ,corporate monsters are allowed to live with limited cash flow. The stranglehold situation needs to change: may be the risk of more quantitative easing needs to be taken as the inflation and interest rate as well as petrol price are extraordinarily low same time in history. In any case, Ozzy does not want any uncertainty factor like leaving EU to complicate his grand plan. He NEEDS these 'in' votes.
    What is this gonna do with us? Call me crazy but if by any stretch of imagination, we can hold these guys in their jugulars with a message : no medical professional will cast any vote in this referendum unless certain conditions are met, making peace with the junior doctors , sorting out all the contracts and/or getting rid of the SOS. Yes, we should not betray the virtue of a democratic proceeding to determine the future of the country but the whole thing has already been politicised by this bunch of despicable politicians after all.

    I am not planning to be a leader nor being 'brave'. Quite frankly , I lost the meaning of either of that after writing comments on this platform through these years. But if a little girl could point a finger and ridicule the emperor with no clothes ,I just follow her footsteps .....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's no need to speculate . Just read his book Direct Democracy - page 72.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We need commentators like you Vinci to state the obvious and see though the spin! Also because you keep up to date with everything, your comments are so insightful.
    It is still staggering to me how people are not getting more upset at Hunts obvious end plan of the break up of the NHS.
    I agree Hunt is utterly ruthless and nothing will stop him unless it really creates such a tsunami that people finally wake up.
    Heaven help us all and our future generations who will have to survive in a world without free health care. Then people will soon discover what true poverty is.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • The pay " increase " in real terms is a reduced pay cut. Please factor in inflation which includes housing costs and you will see what the true pay cuts are .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    A very insightful analysis Nigel.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "17% of voters saying he is doing a good job". Shocked it's that high!

    |Anonymous | GP Partner|07 Mar 2016 10:17am What does it say on page 72?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What's new ? 'They'(politicians) did it to
    the Nursing profession, the Teaching Profession AND the Police ! Why not the Medical Profession ?
    The tactics are to render them 'Don't care any more !' like Dr. Copperfield, THEN the more like that, the weaker the profession !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THE NHS jewel is to made equivalent to the average global health service- there is no room for superiority, unless you are me.
    Have you not noticed how bigoted psychopathic dictators demand uniformity and mediocrity for all whilst wallowing in their own self-evident 'superiority'?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps Azeem could remind us who provided the statistics on which the 7/7 fiasco has been built and played out on?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • medicine tastes awful

    The doctors game plan is to ask for Mr Hunt’s removal from office.

    He is not serious in addressing the problems in the NHS. The issues of Junior doctors are just unacceptable. The problems in General practice has not been dealt with integrity, honesty and with respect it deserves. This man is just kicking the can down the road.

    Time to have a new CEO for the NHS- IF this government wants the NHS to survive. It is a big IF?
    PS -Please support your Juniors on the upcoming strike.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say