Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Poll finds consortium doubts over leadership

By Alisdair Stirling

A quarter of GPs do not have confidence in the heads of their local consortium, and fewer than half believe their leaders have a democratic mandate, a Pulse survey has found.

Our snapshot poll of 450 GPs highlights a growing conflict between grassroots GPs and consortium leaders, with a third of respondents reporting tensions in their consortium.

The findings come after a number of rows between GPs and consortium leaders. Last month, Pulse revealed that GPs in Buckinghamshire and Berkshire had accused a number of consortia of pushing ahead without a democratic mandate.

Asked whether they had confidence in their own consortium's leadership, just 37% of respondents said yes. GPs were split on the crucial question of whether their leaders had a democratic mandate, with 38% saying yes and 37% no.

One GP, who asked not to be named, said her county-wide consortium had been formed with little grassroots input.

‘There has been no consultation at practice level,' she said.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say