This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

QOF changes are extra work by stealth

What does Dr Michael Dixon mean when he talks about 'future versions' of the QOF?

Isn't it about time we stopped the constant movement of the QOF's goalposts?

At the start, the QOF was sensible bread-and-butter stuff, which most of us saw the merit of, and which benefited patient care. It has become degraded by more and more additions of dubious worth, scattered with unseemly attempts by the Department of Health to make aspects so difficult to achieve that it saves the Government a bit of cash.

Remember the concept of no extra work without extra money? These changes to the QOF are achieving the opposite by stealth.

From Dr Andrew Hamilton, Unst, Shetland

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say