This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Quality pay does not cover the extra workload

I have just received the calculation for the quality and outcomes pay for my practice ­ the points aspired to is 1,050, less 174 as I am a PMS practice.

The extra work for my staff and myself has already increased dramatically. The pay for this is grossly inadequate.

The reductions, as all practices are based on £75 divided by variance from the average list size and a square root factor, means that decent pay from Q&O is only achievable by maintaining a ridiculously big list.

I thought the new contract was supposed to reduce workload, not push an already overstretched workforce into early retirement.

This whole farce must now be rejected for the following reasons:

lgreat numbers of practices needing MPIG

lall the delays

lno one should be forced to sign a contract 'under dispute'

lunresolved problem of out-of-hours cover

lextremely poor rates for extra work

lunresolved problems of enhanced services pay.

No wonder NHS managers were laughing.

Dr Stephen Fox

Leigh, Lancashire

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say