Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Rash mum is the one who's flaky, not her itchy son

As a fellow sufferer, Copperfield has every sympathy with those with skin conditions. Just not this particular over-sensitive Mum whose dragged her itchy infant in.

As a fellow sufferer, Copperfield has every sympathy with those with skin conditions. Just not this particular over-sensitive Mum whose dragged her itchy infant in.

This is a picture of my dominant thumb, just to show that I have a good deal of sympathy for people with painful skin conditions. Now and again, usually in the middle of signing a pile of repeat prescriptions it bleeds from one of its recurring fissures.

So you'd think I had a good working knowledge of the local PCT's guidelines on referrals to dermatology out patients. You'd think, but actually I haven't. But I will hazard one guess, somewhere within the small print there'll be a requirement that the skin condition under consideration should be visible to the naked eye.

Using a powerful electron microscope it might just have been possible to see the patches of "severe and untreatable" eczema that's just been presented to me by Anxious Mum. Under normal binocular vision in ambient sunlight, augmented by a dollop of halogen exam light there was, frankly, very little to see.

"There," Anxious Mum pointed, "is where he scratches every night." I didn't show her where I scratch every night, things were going badly enough as it was. If you turned the kid's leg so that the incoming photons from the office window caught the skin at exactly the correct oblique angle you could just about make out bit of flaking.

Even if the kid's skin wasn't flaky, his Mum was. You can tell by the time a kid with an invisible rash is on to his third steroid and fourth moisturiser that the problem is, as the diagnostic codings have it, external to the patient.

So, no, I wasn't about to send the kid off to dermatology out-patients so that the consultant could have a laugh at my expense and send me another copy of his referral guidelines in case the original had been misplaced.

And no, I wasn't going to prescribe a different moisturiser or a different steroid. I did suggest, mainly for sport, that Mum left a small patch of her child's surface untreated for a day or so - in case a perceptible eruption developed. You'd have thought I'd suggested cutting one of his fingers off so I could watch it rot overnight.

So she's off to see someone privately, who will inevitably drop me a line about my charming young patient and his equally delightful Mother suggesting that I hand over a hundred pounds worth of topical tacrolimus for his appalling skin problem.

Well I'm not buying it – and neither will the PCT. That's one private prescription I'm looking forward to signing.

Copperfield Recent posts

Pharmacists' hypocrisy over internet drug sales
New quit smoking regimen leaves no time to light up
A fish called Colin, a penis called Justin
Ejector seat for paramedics perfect for new ambulances
Those condom-phobic middle classes are to blame for rising STIs
My new QOF message to punters. Start smoking!
There's not enough hours in the week...literally
I lied to a patient. But come on, you do it too. Don't you?
Is cholesterol checking all we're good for?
The problem with 'illness of the moment' campaigns
Why I'm dead against vascular screening
GPs as popular as chocolate hob nobs shocker
My MRI scan hit rate will include next radiologist who junks my referral

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say