This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Locums forced to slash fees by 8% due to pensions changes

Comment

Having worked as both a locum and a partner, I would say that I'm much better off in my Partnership but a lot of this is down to job security. Locuming is not a mystical pot of gold. You spend loads of unpaid time managing your bookings and accounts. In addition you end up with voids - unfilled sessions for which you still pay session insurance. Furthermore, some practices forget to pay you or pay less than the rate agreed! I did very similar paperwork and extras as a locum. Partnership seems to carry more costs such as employers national insurance and various other expenses but on balance I think is better remunerated even when you count the unpaid work you do in all the various meetings and fixing things. I think all GPs need to be aware of the divide and conquer strategy being pursued by this government. The differences between salaried, locum and partner are often trivial but have become increasingly divisive. Ultimately we have very similar interests.

Posted date

24 Jun 2013

Posted time

11:31pm

required
required
required