This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Should patients be allowed to self-refer for cancer tests?

Comment

I've always been a little nervous about 5 year survival as a measure. To reduce to the absurd, let us assume that current diagnostic methods result in all patients living 4 years and 364 days after diagnosis, 5 year survival 0%. If we can make the diagnosis 2 days earlier, 5 year survival becomes 100% but nobody has actually lived any longer at all. How much of any supposed increase in 5 year survival in any campaign to improve diagnostics is actually due to real improved survival and how much is due to apparent improved survival?

Posted date

06 Feb 2015

Posted time

11:56am

required
required
required