This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Partners faced with £800,000 potential liability following practice closure

Comment

Muhammad Rahim | GP registrar05 Aug 2016 12:29pm Because presumably if they are leasing it, the site was a third party development, where the value is substantially linked to it being medical premises. This might be an option as a last resort, but landlords don't really like to move to that approach if they've had NHS income. The cost of conversion would also be huge. What has just really struck me from reading the article again is that this practice was on an 'at risk' list - ie we knew it was a problem, and we did sweet fanny adams to prevent this. Draw your own conclusions, but if you don't fit the model, expect to be left out to dry. Has the GP considered opening a private practice in the premises?

Posted date

05 Aug 2016

Posted time

3:24pm

required
required
required