This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Practices 'who do not get along' being forced into CCGs' preferred networks

Comment

It's ore coming down to the needs of Practices being different. Bigger Practices employ Pharmacist's - it improves QoF- we are told. Smaller achieve 100% QoF without pharmacists. So, with 30% of funding to come from the pocket of Practices, are smaller Practices going to opt to have a Pharmacist? I don't think so. The stitch up is in forcing PCNs to employ staff which CCGs promise will improve productivity - the bottom line is that Practices have to pay 30% of this additional staff expense from their budgets and there is nowhere to recover this money from !! This is an additional expense and we don't know when and whether this will bring results or profits. In a year, all the staff newly employed will have employment rights and at that stage, the govt may change it's mind and stop funding even the 70% they are contributing this year. Do we trust that this will not happen? Choose and Book was a fine example. Tread carefully, the coals can get really hot!

Posted date

10 Apr 2019

Posted time

4:19pm

required
required
required