This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


How much of our prescribing has a beneficial effect?


Great article which echoes some longstanding concerns I hold. Examples- "Dr, my ankles are swollen but my BP is great on that amlodipine stuff"; "Have some frusemide". "My anxiety is better on Sh#talopram but I have a cough with mucky spit";"I see you are allergic to penicillin- have some erythromycin" (QTc anyone?). I could go on and on and then some. I have found that in the presence of polypharmacy considering iatrogenic causes pretty early can frequently be a high yielding input, and a glance at the BNF vey worthwhile. The title asks a question the response to which is best framed in terms of the patient (answer-often not), the doctor (answer- beneficial if you want to get on with your session and make the patient feel somethings been done), and the chosen timescale (longterm- both patient and doctor lose).

Posted date

19 Sep 2019

Posted time