This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


The CQC must turn words into action


(1) The sentiment of this CQC report could not stop people from relating to a drop( only a drop) of crocodile tears . Every matter has its origin and tail . Every incident has its beginning and ending . Only knowing what is the order and sequence of events , one can learn the ‘true way ‘ . Remember what CQC previous chief once said three year ago ?, ‘’Professor Steve Field told the Daily Mail that general practice has ‘failed as a profession’ and he was ‘ashamed’ to be a GP because of the poor care he saw in certain practice.’’ Fast forward the clock to today , how do you feel , Professor? Should somebody be more ashamed of himself instead ? In politics , all you need is a bit of insouciance from the ‘key’ leader and disasters will follow . We have seen this too many times . (2) CQC was falling into the same slippery slope fallacy and mentality as GMC , that the stronger the regulation and oversight are in place , the health services , especially general practice, will be better . Yes , this is politically correct only when the ‘system’ is fundamentally sound and healthy . Austerity, Health and Social Care Bill , hapless/hopeless government(s) crippled by Brexit fiasco etc , are all background factors contributing to this ‘state’ of GP . The presumption that ‘the bigger the provider is , the better ; the cheaper , the better ‘ was never an healthy one but only overcompensating a system completely dried out of resources (money , manpower, expertise and time) . Together with the slippery slope fallacy mentioned above , we have a perfect storm. (3) Both CQC and GMC are fraught with a superhero complex that their first duty was to protect the public without realising their blind spots of actually killing the chickens before any egg could be laid . As a regulatory body , they have both duties of ensuring the care providers can potentially improve but more importantly, the government is doing all to ensure that these improvements can materialise . This is even more paramount simply because the providers are funded by government in a system called NHS . Blindly protecting the clause ‘ tax-payer money must be used properly’ had , so far , shifted regulator like CQC towards an unconscious (some may argue was conscious) bias . We saw this evidently in their attitude towards general practitioners in NHS , up to now . We are where we are in this reality ,l.CQC has a decision to make where it should position itself ,against a backdrop of a dysfunctional government? If its primary duty is still to ‘protect’ the public , their ‘regulation’ must start from the ‘top’ NOT from the bottom........

Posted date

16 Oct 2019

Posted time