Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Stability? No, keep reforming

The recent King's Fund report by Sir Derek Wanless concluded that the extra health spending has delivered poor value for money and that rising costs in the future threaten to undermine the NHS.

It also concluded that the current policy framework is right and that the financing system should remain unchanged.

Given the poor results, it is extraordinary to conclude that the current policy framework should remain. The Government's central planning has skewed health resources towards secondary care when it would have been better spent on prevention and new primary care services, something the report agrees with.

How many more years are we going to have to listen to PCTs crowing on about shifting resources but it never actually happening?

Many clinicians are calling for a period of stability, but if anything we need more radical reform if the NHS is to survive at all. Its current problems stem from the decision to spend rather than reform.

The changes we have experienced over the last decade have concentrated on structural reform of trusts rather than actually changing what clinicians do.

This is because clinicians have not been given the power or opportunity to shape the changes. The result is a virtual disengagement of those who know what is going on and could provide viable solutions – namely the GPs reading this letter.

From Dr Paul Charlson, Brough, East Yorkshire, and member of Doctors for Reform

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say