•"GPs feel defensive. They did very well out of their new contracts. Dispensing doctors are unhappy about the expansion of pharmacy services, and they all talk to each other. They see it as taking business away from them. There will be professional antagonism, based on income. Some GPs may find it threatening."
•"Some want to protect their own patch and don’t want to delegate these services."
•"More uncomfortable if pharmacists encroach too much in, for example, chronic illness management."
•"Concern amongst GPs that pharmacists would unearth problem and then simply pass on the problem to the GP."
Newsletter sign up
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
DH plans to move 50 million GP appointments to pharmacists
29 Jun 09
The Department of Health has plans to transfer more than 50 million “quick win” appointments from GPs to pharmacists, as part of a strategy to massively expand the involvement of pharmacy
Documents obtained by Pulse reveal the DH have identified certain groups of people it thinks can be encouraged to see a pharmacist instead of their GP.
The plans were informed by DH consumer research but telephone interviews were also carried out with GPs, pharmacists and also GPC members.
Their research suggests 51 million GP consultation are for minor ailments alone which could be handled by pharmacists instead.
The provision of health tests, vascular risk assessment, weight management, chlamydia screening and diabetes were all identified as ‘a quick win’.
Dr Bill Beeby, a GP in Middlesbrough and chair of clinical and prescribing subcommittee at GPC, said the target of 51m appointments was unrealistic.
He told Pulse: ‘People keep coming up with a list of conditions that could be treated by pharmacists. That’s easy to say but not easy to do. These conditions need to be diagnosed correctly and you need a GP to do that. Time and time again I see people who come to me because they could not be diagnosed by a pharmacists.
‘I don’t understand why people keep trying to break up health services. I’m not saying pharmacists should be excluded or anything like that, we should be working together, but they are trying to promote something that is not achievable.
‘I worry there’s a lot of money being spent on promoting things that can be funded and done in general practice. It’s all very well catching people as they pass by the on the high street but it’s quite another to provide care for them.’
The plans were revealed as Professor Nick Barber, professor of pharmacy at the school of pharmacy, University of London, and a member of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain council, called for partnership between GPs and pharmacists to avoid creating an ‘unsustainable’ health system.
‘The use of medicines is ever growing, yet there are not enough doctors in the UK. The current system is unsustainable and puts patients at risk - already 5% of hospital admissions are a result of avoidable harm from medicines. A sustainable partnership between GPs and pharmacists is the only rational way forward.’
GPs' views on pharmacy expansion







Readers' comments
Why is there this constant desire to retrain people do the work of those already trained to do it while neglecting the skills that they already have.
There are many important services which pharmacists could provide within the NHS which are presently neglected. It makes more sense to make full and proper use of their undoubted knowledge and skills in medicine management rather than train them for tasks for which a large and well trained workforce already exists.
Before my local pharmacy holds any of my medical records, I would want assurance that they, and all their staff, are bound by the same laws of confidentiality as my GP and with the same level of sanctions for any breaches.
Pharmacists clearly are bound by strict codes of ethics and laws and are at equal risk of striking-off as GPs. That is not the argument.