This site is intended for health professionals only

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Login: Register | Forgotten password

Newsletter sign up

E-mail sign-up
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Main Page Content:

GPs told to ignore choice and refer to Care UK services

16 Feb 10

Exclusive: GPs are being told to refer thousands of patients to the private sector to bail out a Government scheme to outsource services from hospitals, Pulse can reveal.

A group of 10 PCTs is insisting practices send patients to services run by the company Care UK, after it emerged they were currently seeing fewer than a third of the projected number of referrals.

GPs have been warned they could even face action from the GMC if they refuse to refer patients en masse to the company.

Trusts who will foot the bill from the Department of Health’s contract, which pays Care UK a block sum even if services are under-used, are warning they face dire financial consequences if they cannot ensure GPs refer to the private facilities rather than local services.

It comes after Derby City PCT admitted offering payments to GPs to send patients to an independent sector treatment centre in its area.

The latest move has outraged some GPs, who claim it makes a mockery of the Government’s choice agenda and health secretary Andy Burnham’s claim that the NHS is its ‘provider of choice’.

Care UK won a seven-year contract to provide general surgery, ENT, gynaecology, urology and orthopaedics services across 10 PCTs in Greater Manchester, through an independent sector clinical assessment and treatment service (ISCATS). But the services, launched last year, have attracted just 25-30% of anticipated numbers.

A letter sent to GPs in NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale – which alone faces a £2m funding crisis – said: ‘Unless there are compelling reasons, all patients will be referred to ISCATS on the advice of their GP during a choice discussion’.

Dr Nick Dawes, medical director of NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale, told Pulse: ‘The CATS contract was a DH contract that we had very little input in. We’ve now got to maximise the capacity in our commissioning of the service and we’ve been having robust conversations with GPs. It’s incumbent on them as part of their registration with the GMC to use resources efficiency. My understanding is some PCTs are considering mandating it.’

GPs in Greater Manchester have been told to use Choose and Book to direct patients to the Care UK service.

Ironically, ISCATS was originally envisaged as a mandatory pathway for referrals but this was overturned by the Government’s choice agenda.

Dr Ravi Mene, secretary of Salford and Trafford LMC, said: ‘PCTs are trying to force GPs to refer to ISCATS. I would rather refer to my local hospital and make sure it survives.’

Dr Michael Taylor, a GP in Heywood, said: ‘Some GPs feel this impinges on their clinical freedom. I am sure it wouldn’t have happened unless there was a financial imperative.’

A Care UK spokesperson said its services meant patients being seen closer to home, with ‘state-of-the-art diagnostic pro-cesses’ and ‘much shorter waiting times than in hospital’.

GPC negotiator Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: ‘This situation is a result of a politically driven procurement of the private sector by the Government.

‘Forcing GPs to refer to a private provider flies in the face of the Government’s rhetoric around patient choice and wholly contradicts Andy Burnham’s claims that the NHS is the preferred provider.’

The BMA last week launched a PR campaign urging patients to rally against privatisation, claiming providers are receiving millions in guaranteed payments for contracts, even when under-used. BMA chair Dr Hamish Meldrum said: ‘As the public purse-strings tighten, it is crucial that public money is no longer wasted on expensive commercial experiments.’

Readers' comments

  • Allan Stewart | 16 Feb 10

    GPs should not jeopardise their integrity to bail out a government which has now lost all integrity. They cannot blow their trumpet about choice and then behave in this despicable way. GPs must stand their ground and make sure that the advice that they are giving is purely in the interests of the patients.

  • Peter Gooderham - Cardiff | 16 Feb 10

    Recourse to threatening GPs with the GMC over this government mismanagement is a demonstration of bullying and moral bankruptcy.

  • Andy Jones - Hereford | 16 Feb 10

    'Robust conversations' heh heh heh. I'd love to be a fly on the wall for those!! Then the usual GMC argument reminding us that we are to use resources efficiently. Mmm, also there in the GMC mandates is always putting your patient first and doing no harm which would over-ride such conflicts of interest in my opinion. What a terrible state of affairs and what should be occuring is that the contract with the private providers should be ripped up and unilaterally altered as seems to occur regularly with our so-called contracts!! Ooh it does make my piss boil.


Post and bookmark this story at the following sites:What is this?

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

16 Feb 10

You must be logged in to add a comment

 

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement