This site is intended for health professionals only

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Login: Register | Forgotten password

Newsletter sign up

E-mail sign-up
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Main Page Content:

GP contract overhaul ends MPIG and reshapes QOF

14 Oct 08

The GP contract is to be radically reshaped, with the QOF reduced as a proportion of pay, the square root formula scrapped and moves begun to phase out the MPIG.

GPs will also be handed a raft of new outcome-based QOF targets and will lose payment for the GP Patient Survey under a complex and far-reaching package of changes to the contract.

NHS Employers announced it had agreed with the GPC a fundamental overhaul of the GMS contract, to apply for 2009/10 in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

At the centre of the deal is a new formula for ‘differential uplift’ of the various components of the GMS contract.

The global sum, QOF, enhanced services and correction factor payments will be increased in the ratio 7:5:5:2. Locum and seniority payments will be frozen.

But the two sides could not come to an agreement over the overall size of the uplift, to be decided on by the Doctors’ and Dentists’ Review Body.

The deal spells doom for the controversial QOF square root formula. NHS Employers said in a statement it would be revised to ‘increasingly reflect the prevalence of long-term health conditions among local populations’.

This would ‘help address health inequalities by ensuring proportionately greater funding for practices in areas of high deprivation’.

The agreement will see reallocation of 72 QOF points as part of a refocusing on outcome targets. There will be a new indicator for reducing early cessation of treatment in depression, extra points for drug treatment in heart failure, CKD, diabetes and COPD, and a new indicator for offering choice and advice on contraception.

“People need to remember whatever happens is bound to be flavoured by the credit crunch.”

Dr Peter Holden, GPC negotiator

The GPC had vowed to oppose cuts to MPIG correction factor payments without suitable compensation.

But Barbara Hakin, GMS lead negotiator for NHS Employers, said: ‘We are particularly pleased to have reached agreement in reducing GP reliance on the MPIG. Although it was a disappointment not to have been able to agree an uplift to the contract, I think both sides regard this agreement as fair – and one that brings substantial benefits to patients.’

GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman said: ‘This helps develop funding in a way that recognises our most needy patients. GPs know the contract needs to be more stable and less dependent on corrective mechanisms.’

Health secretary Alan Johnson said: ‘Today’s agreement begins the move towards a fairer funding system for practices, based on the number of patients on a practice’s list and the health needs of the local population. It also introduces improvements to the QOF to recognise and reward high-quality patient care and a stronger focus on health outcomes.’

GPC negotiator Dr Peter Holden said there would be a ‘shake-up’ of the square root formula and confirmed payment for the patient survey would go.

And he warned GPs to brace themselves for a tough deal: ‘The idea is, whatever the uplift, everybody gets something. But people need to remember whatever happens is bound to be flavoured by the credit crunch.

‘The other thing to stress is the whole thing is a package. Nothing is agreed till everything is agreed.’

Readers' comments

  • Nick Bentley - Knaresborough | 15 Oct 08

    So an even further bias towards areas of health deprivation. OK, BUT - has no-one twigged that PCT surpluses are concentrated in areas of high deprivation due to lower uptake - so will these surpluses be allowed to get bigger? Bias to areas of higher deprivation implies less cash for areas of lower deprivation - where, surprise, surprise, all the deficits have occurred.

    We, in an area of lower deprivation, have had to scrimp and save, the PCT has cut referrals, PBC has not materialised as PCT focus has been totally on reducing pressure from the SHA about the size of the deficit. Why not allow surpluses to be used to offset deficits in any one year? A mechanism such as this needs to be in place if half the country is not to remain in limbo.

  • john howard | 15 Oct 08

    I will require some time to reflect on the proposed changes. It comes as no suprise in the aftermath of the media bashing about us as GPs being overpaid and under worked. At the end of the day who cares what I think. However isn't it interesting regarding the comment about a fairer system of funding based on list size - excuse my failing short term memory but isn't that how we used to be paid!!!


Post and bookmark this story at the following sites:What is this?

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

14 Oct 08

What do you think of the changes? Are they fair? Are you a winner or loser?

You must be logged in to add a comment

 

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement