This site is intended for health professionals only

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Login: Register | Forgotten password

Newsletter sign up

E-mail sign-up
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Main Page Content:

Editorial

The jaw-dropping price of Darzi centres

01 Jul 09

With the cost of GP-led health centres averaging three times as much as GMS practices, and rising to as much as seven times the price, serious questions must be asked over value and affordability


Editorial

This week marks the anniversary of one of the most hyped documents in the history of the NHS. Lord Darzi’s NHS Next Stage Review could hardly have failed to disappoint, promising as it did to transform the health service from ageing institution into sleek, modern, patient-centred dream.

In the end, Lord Darzi pulled back from many of his more radical pronouncements, dropping plans to roll out full-scale polyclinics nationally, and focusing instead on heart-warming but arguably meaningless concepts such as quality and clinical leadership.

But the review was not all motherhood and apple pie. While the prospect of 25-doctor supersurgeries may have receded, their cousins, the GP-led health centres, were ushered into every corner of England. The policy was sold as a huge injection of cash into primary care, but over the past year has been rigorously imposed on even the most unwilling PCTs. And, as our investigation this week shows, there are questions over what all the extra money has bought.

There have been suggestions for almost a year now that the cash on offer for these centres might be rather more generous than for a typical practice. Last October, Pulse reported Derbyshire County PCT was offering twice the funding for its health centre that GMS practices get. But trusts have proved far from willing to release their figures, rebuffing previous Freedom of Information requests with complaints about commercial confidentiality and claims that the release of data would prejudice tendering. Now we know why NHS managers were so reluctant to let the numbers enter the public domain.

Some of the figures are simply astonishing. In NHS Halton and St Helens, the GP-led health centre is initially receiving £560 per registered patient, more than seven times typical GMS funding. NHS Doncaster’s health centre gets £412.50 per registered patient, plus extra cash for walk-in patients. And the resources allocated to NHS East Riding of Yorkshire’s centre are particularly likely to raise eyebrows. It gets £381.47 per patient, and is run by a group of GPs that includes BMA chair Dr Hamish Meldrum.

PCTs insist that GP-led health centres do not provide the same level of service as GMS or PMS practices. They open eight till eight, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and offer a range of extra services too, so of course they cost more – so the argument goes. Up to a point, they are right. Offering a wider range of services, for longer, will have a higher price. But rather than being an answer, that surely raises fresh questions.

If this is the true cost of opening at evenings and weekends, can the NHS possibly afford it? If running a GP-led health centre costs this much in Lancashire and Yorkshire, how can two PCTs in the south of England run their centre for just £63.21 per patient? How can the NHS justify offering some patients highly expensive services and not others? And is the ability of the BMA to scrutinise the rollout hampered by the involvement of its chair?

Readers' comments

  • John Fitton | 01 Jul 09

    This insane profligacy must be stopped. What really works well is an extended hours GP service including Saturday mornings till 11.30 backed up by a GP-led -and-run out of hours co-operative. The whole lot costs less than £120 per annum per patient for a 24hr 365 day a year service.

    If it works, don't mend it!

  • peter scott | 15 Jul 09

    Thank heavens he has gone before he had any other bright ideas for the NHS. The Dark Knight of the Gilded Laparoscope has presided over the setting up of his eponymous Walk-in centres in all 152 English PCT's, and has provided a prohibitively expensive alternative to the 35,000 GP's that provide traditional Primary Care services in the country. The plurality that this service permits will be the wheel upon which the government will try to break the back of General Practice as we know it.


Post and bookmark this story at the following sites:What is this?

Post your comment

You must fill in all fields marked *

01 Jul 09

You must be logged in to add a comment

 

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-

Advertisement