Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Stroke care pay anomaly

GPs may be missing out on payments for high-quality stroke care because the Read code system for the disease is a confusing mess, researchers say.

A new study found the achievement of QOF points was not related to gold standard quality of care. Instead, high achievement was related to use of Read codes that were compatible with the QOF.

Study leader Dr Simon de Lusignan, senior lecturer in primary care informatics at St George's, London, said the number of Read codes needed to be streamlined to avoid confusion among GPs.

Dr de Lusignan, a GP in Guildford, Surrey, said: 'There are too many codes for stroke and TIA which sit outside the QOF. So high QOF points mean good GP care – but it's not necessarily [poor] stroke care if QOF points are lacking.'

His study, in the latest edition of Informatics in Primary Care, analysed stroke care in two practices, in Surrey and southwest London. One got 93.5 per cent of available QOF points and the other 73.4, but the latter had 'much better' adherence to RCP guidelines.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say