Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The great contract debate

  • Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

Sorry to bang on about the new contract. But even NICE’s astounding new guidance on secondary prevention in patients who’ve had an MI – with its bold pronouncement that we no longer need to prescribe these patients fish oils – isn’t enough to shift the great contract debate from the top of the coffee-break agenda.

Now the dust is beginning to settle, it’s becoming clear to me that some of the less trumpeted contract changes represent missed opportunities. For example:

  • Abolition of practice boundaries. I think someone has accidentally done a “find ‘shrink’ and replace with ‘abolish’” on every draft contract reference to practice boundaries. Because the only realistic way to cope with what is expected of us now, and in the future, is to have a) Some control over our workload b) Fewer patients c) More time. And what this requires, apart from more GPs, is a smaller area of responsibility – if not philosophically, then geographically. Personally, I’d like my practice area to be reduced to roughly the size of my consulting room.
  • Publication of the full net income of GPs. You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to see where this one’s going ie straight into a certain tabloid newspaper’s front page headline. I’d like to suggest that, in the next round of contract negotiations, national newspapers are forced to publish, each year, the estimated number of lives we GPs have saved through monitoring blood pressure, dishing out statins, running the flu vaccination campaign and so on. Because if Jeremy Hunt wants the public to assess ‘value for money’, the punters need to know our worth as well as our pay.
  • Abolition of seniority payments. Thanks a bunch. But instead of these being tipped back into the pot – and, boy, will we be watching to make sure that happens – they perhaps should have been converted to Juniority Payments. Given the recruitment crisis and the fact that older GPs are perceived as the Fat Cats of the profession, it would have been a lovely gesture to provide an incentive to younger doctors to join general practice – far nicer than the two-fingered one they think we’re currently giving them.

Still, it’s not all bad news. At least we can forget about trying to spell ‘eicosapentaenoic acid’.

 Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can email him at tonycopperfield@hotmail.com and follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Thanks Tony spot-on as usual.
    Barrie

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely the reason for getting rid of practice boundaries is to let well mobile working people be looked after by Branson's establishment . They are unlikely to need referral so that knowledge of their local hospital is not required and their problems usually need one stop simple treatments . Patients with chronic and complex needs will require experienced doctors not usually found under the virgin label . We wouldn't be eligible to work for virgin because we've all been screwed by the new contract.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Dr, could you please make a house call as I think I need to take some more time off work after straining my leg at the gym last week."
    "Yes, that's right I'm registered with your practice as it is near where I work in London, but I live in Norwich. See you in a couple of hours?"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder