Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The key players' views on the contract sticking points

With the GPC preparing to make a final decision this week on whether to ballot GPs on the contract, negotiators still have a long way to go to hammer out a deal on the make-or-break issues

On switching from census data to

GPs' registered lists

GP negotiators: Want to keep pay per patient

at £53 and fund switch from elsewhere

in contract.

Dr John Chisholm, GPC chair: 'If we did nothing else the money would fall to £49.85 per patient. We are looking at not making that drop.'

NHS Confederation: Committed in principle to the switch, but will veto demand to divert cash from quality into global sum.

Mike Farrar, lead negotiator: 'We are not prepared to renegotiate a category of the contract to find a solution to the redistribution effect of registered lists that changes the overall balance.'

GPC: Switch must be agreed before ballot can go ahead.

Dr Charles Simenoff, GPC member: 'I want

a signed commitment from Alan Milburn

that GP remuneration will be based on

registered lists.'

Weighting quality pay according to practice disease prevalence

GP negotiators and NHS Confederation: Committed in principle, need to work out feasibility.

Dr John Chisholm: 'Government is prepared to be flexible in moving to a system perceived to be

fairer and based on relative workload as long as it is cost neutral.'

GPC: Deal must be agreed before ballot can go ahead.

Dr Ron Singer, GPC member: 'My minimum requirements would be changing to registered lists, including disease prevalence in quality and de-linking quality from the Carr-Hill formula.'

Ending 100/150 quality point penalty for MPIG practices

GP negotiators: Not seen as a 'must-win'.

NHS Confederation: Not important.

Mike Farrar: 'This would have to be paid for by other GPs. I think a lot of GPs would not support funding a small offset to a particular group of practices.'

GPC: Support end to penalty but not seen as vital.

Dr Rob Barnett, GPC member: 'It is high on my agenda.'

Early review of Carr-Hill formula

GP negotiators and NHS Confederation: Agreed on review in October 2004, likely to commit to inclusion of other factors, such as patients' ethnicity.

GPC: Acceptance that new formula not achievable in two weeks but need commitment to early review.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC member: 'In an ideal situation I would wish not to see a ballot before the revision of Carr-Hill, but we risk losing the implementation because of the legislative timetable.'

Expanding eligibility for seniority pay

GP negotiators and NHS Confederation: Proposals to follow shortly.

More clarification on way ahead for PMS

GP negotiators: Government has to take the lead.

Department of Health: Pledge to allow PMS GPs to compare income with pay under new contract 'soon'.

GPC: Need to stem the flood of GPs into PMS.

Dr Peter Fellows, GPC member: 'If over half of GPs enter PMS the incentive (for the Government) to negotiate for GMS will be lost.'

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say