The politics behind the minimum alcohol pricing plan
There was much scratching of heads in the Pulse newsroom this morning, as we worked out how best to cover the Chief Medical Officer’s minimum alcohol pricing plan.
By Steve Nowottny
There was much scratching of heads in the Pulse newsroom this morning, as we worked out how best to cover the Chief Medical Officer's minimum alcohol pricing plan.
The problem was this – no sooner had Sir Liam Donaldson set out his plan (introducing minimum pricing as an ‘immediate priority', with a suggested minimum price per unit of 50p), the Prime Minister shot it down.
At Gordon Brown's press conference this morning, even as Sir Liam was elsewhere explaining how the heavily-trailed proposals would actually work, the PM appeared to put the kibosh on the idea. ‘We do not want the responsible, sensible majority of moderate drinkers to have to pay more or suffer as a result of the excesses of a tiny minority,' he said.
In fact, while the BMA and the Liberal Democrats sort-of-kind-of liked the idea, Mr Brown seemed to be speaking for the majority when he dismissed it as overkill. He even, whisper it, agreed with Dr Rant, surely a first.
But the question then arose – and hence the collective scratching of heads at Pulse – why would one part of the Government suggest such a controversial solution to rising levels of binge drinking, if another part of the Government was going to dismiss it out of hand just 24 hours later?
Well, there are lots of possible reasons, of course, and just because Sir Liam Donaldson is the Chief Medical Officer doesn't make him the puppet of Number 10. But the BBC's Nick Robinson reminds us that under the Government's booze duty escalator duties on alcohol will go up by 2% above inflation in each of the next four years. And the budget is, of course, due next month.
Coincidence? Perhaps. But as Robinson puts it:
'Do you think, just possibly, that a rise in the tax on alcohol might make it into the Budget speech given that it can be presented as a measure with all-party support designed to improve health and combat anti-social behaviour and not merely a tax rise?'Recent posts
Federations: policy pipe-dream or the future for GPs? March 13
'104% of practices using Choose and Book.' So how's that then? March 10
QOF and MPIG changes: what your PCT is doing March 3
GPC's exaggerated claims on QOF losers starting to pay dividends February 27
Extended hours? You must be joking... February 25
Should GMC have spent £43,000 on Cape Town junket? Feburary 20
Pay survey by next week? MPIGs might fly... February 18
Lord Darzi, GQ superstar February 13
Why GPs will no longer have a choice over Choice February 12
The strange contenders for the world's best GP job February 11
When is a consultation not a consultation? When it's on polyclinics February 10
What would you ask Alan Johnson February 05
Choose and Book: we told you so February 04
Is the straight white male GP really an endangered species? February 02
Preparing for power 30 January
Profits drop not the only story from GP survey January 29
Choose and Book: Two steps back, one step forward January 26
Lord Darzi's secret meeting with the private sector January 22
The best GP job in the world? January 21
Setting a minimum price for alcohol will help curb binge drinking, the CMO claims Setting a minimum price for alcohol will help curb binge drinking, the CMO claims