This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

A Band-Aid won’t stop us ‘withering’ away

  • Print
  • 9
  • Rate
  • Save

A close friend of mine had to undergo coronary artery stenting recently. Unfortunately, the puncture site bled in the middle of the night and the scene was somewhat akin to Nightmare on Elm Street. He had three nurses around his bedside trying to stem the bleeding and it wasn’t until a fourth, of the more burly variety, practically sat on him, that the bleeding subsided. The nocturnal activity didn’t stop there, though. He continued to have half-hourly pulse and blood pressure checks to ensure there was no haemodynamic compromise.

If you truly wish to resuscitate us, stop sticking plasters all over us

What my friend didn’t have was a pretty little Finding Nemo plaster stuck on his arterial puncture site, with advice to talk to the other patients if the bleeding didn’t stop. Neither was he asked to donate blood that morning, as it was his regular slot to do so. And the nurses chose not to go on their break, but to monitor him closely.

But that’s because this is clinical staff we are talking about. These are dedicated professionals who are not interested in political soundbites or gongs, but have given a lifetime of humanity to the NHS. This is not NHS England, which can hide behind the rhetoric of its so-called ‘rescue package’ while practices are forced to close or merge on a daily basis.

The vast discrepancy between the financial haemorrhage and the tiny plasters of resilience funding would be comical if it were not so tragic. Vulnerable practices may secure a few thousand pounds at most as they reel from the onslaught of MPIG removal, PMS funding reviews and 300% increases in premises service charges. And even the paltry sums on offer must be spent on ‘change managers’ or ‘project teams’.

Let’s be clear on what this rescue package is really about. It’s not about saving vulnerable practices at all. In fact, it seems they can all ‘fail and wither’ according to one NHS England director. If rescue was the aim, then the PMS review funding changes would have shifted everyone up to the highest-funded practice, and not the lowest. NHS managers would have halted the scandalous increase in service charges faced by many inner-city practices, rendering them unsustainable. And partnership seniority would have been retained and crown indemnity offered.

No, the objective of this rescue package Band-Aid is to keep practices on the life- support machine for long enough to facilitate working at scale. You see, NHS England will have a real problem on its bloody hands if too many practices hand back their contracts – the NHS would collapse before the fat cats could pounce. But keep plugging the holes with corks and they may last long enough to form takeover-friendly units of 100,000 patients.

So my message to NHS England is this – if you truly wish to resuscitate us, stop sticking plasters all over us. Give us a blood transfusion, take us to theatre and then care for us in the high-dependency unit. If not, why not put us out of our misery and pull the plug on us now?

Because if we ‘fail and wither’, so does the NHS. Maybe that’s the hidden agenda?

Dr Shaba Nabi is a GP trainer in Bristol

Rate this blog  (4.85 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (9)

  • But before he sticking plaster arrives the CQC puts a pillow over his face. Then the astronomical funeral charges bankrupts the grieving relatives.

    Here lies your local GP - Rest In Pieces.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a good article;

    I think as a profession we need to start being realistic about the demise of the NHS and realities of a co-payment system like everywhere else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @11.49
    I think we need to be realistic about the deliberate vandalism that has occurred to our NHS since about 2010.
    There is a vast difference between an system that does not work and a system that is being deliberately undermined so that it does not work.
    Reducing GDP funding year by year at a time when the population and demand is rising is clearly only going to have one result.
    And us one of the richest countries in the world despite it all?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @11.49am
    PS- I have not read the article in the Daily Telegraph because there is no longer any such thing as a 'good' article in the Daily Telegraph.
    Unless you are in the top 1% of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @12.02 Read it you might be surprised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The telegraph article is clearly supporting the Tory privatisation agenda. Starve a system of funds util it doesn't work .People want something better . There is the excuse to privatise . Capita confirms that this is the policy . Planned inefficiency. There is plenty of money out there it just needs distributing more fairly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please be careful when reading these articles - they come with an agenda. Having said that, if the Tories don't want to fund the NHS and the public are voting enthusiastically for their position we might have to accept something else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    The Fourth Estate (or fourth power) is a societal or political force or institution whose influence is not consistently or officially recognized. "Fourth Estate" most commonly refers to the news media, especially print journalism or "the press".
    Problem is :while great power comes with great responsibility , power also comes with corruption and absolute power comes with absolute corruption . The Leveson Inquiry in 2011 demonstrated the latter part of the dichotomy .
    But at the end , I tend to agree with Thomas Jefferson as far as preserving freedom of speech is concerned:
    ''If I had to choose between government without newspapers and newspapers without government , I wouldn't hesitate to choose the latter''
    Thomas Jefferson

    Everybody has own right to choose what one wants to believe. History will judge...........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whatever, we do not get any sympathy from our patients and public either?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • 9
  • Rate
  • Save