Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

A torturous remediation meeting

  • Print
  • Comments (10)
  • Save

The doctor was angry.

It had been 18 months since he had admitted that he had been doing things in his practise that were not consistent with safe and standard NHS general practice.

Since then, his practice and behaviours had been scrutinised with a succession of interventions.

He had produced detailed professional and personal development plans, done audits, undertaken video consultation analysis, done patient and colleague feedback surveys and a considerable number of detailed clinical reviews and reflective statements.

He had had an external review of his record-keeping, his prescribing and his referrals and he had agreed to undertake a clinical assessment by NCAS (for which there was a considerable waiting time).

Each time he had achieved an objective, a new obstacle was put in his path.

Was it the GMC who had put him through such prolonged scrutiny? No: this was due to the demands and processes set by the former PCT (now the area team).

I attended a meeting between the doctor, his medicolegal adviser and representatives from the area team. The doctor’s anger was understandable but hard to hear. He felt as if he had been tortured and said he had ‘been to hell and back’. His whole life, his confidence and his family had been turned upside down. If he had not shown insight, acceptance and willingness to change from the start, my sympathy and understanding would have been limited.

But this was a good man and a good doctor, who had gone astray in a single area of practice - who had then put it right, doing everything that was expected of him and more.

What did the area team think of the documents and supporting information he had submitted eight months previously, as part of his enhanced development plan?

Unfortunately these had been filed unseen, as they were not considered a critical part of the scrutiny required by the decision-making panel for the performers list.

The medicolegal adviser, an experienced doctor, raised concerns.

‘Just what is going on here?,’ he asked. ‘When will someone undertake to review these documents submitted in good faith? I am very concerned about some of the practices and processes at work.’

Remediation should not be about striving for perfection but protecting patients, with action plans to put things right running to just one or two pages. Goal posts need to be agreed and then adhered to, with tight timescales so the process does not drag on.

There needs to be clarity as to what should be done locally (and who should fund it) and what should be done by the local education and training boards, the National Clinical Assessment Scheme, and the GMC. There needs to be funding for remediation for GPs just as there is for doctors in secondary care.

But throughout England, area teams are woefully short of people struggling to pick up the work previously done by PCTs.

As for the doctor, he is still angry. He reports that he has been left with a profound sense of despondence and bitterness toward a system that he feels commands so much power.

The LMC Insider is chief executive of an LMC in England. He is also a practising GP

 

Readers' comments (10)

  • This is a complete disgrace.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This just shows that if we do not look after ourselves and our family (at the expense of all else), no one will look after you when you are in trouble. Even GP's are not looking after each other.
    There is no good will out there for GPs from anyones, so do your job to the specific requirements, no more and no less, and go home to your family. practice defensive medicine and refer most things that make you feel uncomfortable or give you any degree of clinical doubt. At the end of the day, none of us want to be in this positions and we must do everything to ensure we don't end up there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Andrew Langsley architect of this disastrous change for the NHS - has been rotated out of the government quietly for his past sins.

    Unfortunately his sins have left us with the pile of steaming trouble than is NHS England - Not fit for purpose, and barely any competent staff left to have any purpose.

    Time for these useless managerial leeches to go into the unemployment office and start repaying their debts to society.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Disgusting. He should sue them. No wonder nobody wants to be a GP these days.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is better to locum in a walk centre and urgent care centre. Just do your 8hr shift and go.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I know a similar experience where the doctor didn't do anything wrong (every investigation, audit, and so on has revealed no wrongdoing) and yet the PCT / now LAT continued to harass the GP. It's been going on for years now. The medical director no longer practices (apart from the bare minimum) and just enjoys the power.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ricardo Gaudoin

    This is not only happening to the now 'poor' GP's but to most health professionals employed by the 'new' NHS. CCGs are not to blame for what they were pushed and forced into.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • nhs ahs become full of well paid admin staff and awful clinical governance staff who lose the value of all the services offered and focus on error..sometimes serious and warranted and sometimes low impact .
    this case is unclear as facts not disclosed

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11.04 has made a serios error what is ahs lets have him

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • you seemed to make some very in depth evaluations of this doctors ability, attitude, ethos and professionalism in this meeting, well done

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (10)
  • Save