This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

We need to be able to refer, not defer

  • Print
  • 3
  • Rate
  • Save

I thought the barrel-bottom of CCG bright ideas had been well and truly scraped a few years back - when local blue-sky-thinkers suggested sending GPs into our DGH to discharge patients from wards if they didn’t really need to be there. But no. Because now we have this brainwave from NHS St Helens CCG suggesting that GPs might be blocked from making routine referrals for four months or so. Because, you know, winter’s busy in secondary care, and heck, patients won’t mind (though apparently you do have to check).

I’m starting to think I might be a bit of a simpleton because I really don’t get this, despite furiously scratching my head for the last few days. And I don’t get it on a number of levels:

  1. We have a contractual obligation to refer as and when we deem it necessary. So we can’t not. A referral is a referral, not a deferral.
  2. We have quite enough medicolegal jeopardy already, ta.
  3. If we have to put patients in limbo, why does that have to be located in, and the responsibility of, GPs?
  4. It doesn’t solve this problem, it just boots it unceremoniously down the road.
  5. This is the thin end of an ethically dodgy wedge. Which ends - if you really want to extrapolate on a long but entirely logical continuum - with us culling selected punters every autumn on the basis that it’ll be the only way to cope with the inevitable winter pressure. You know, thinking outside the box even if it involves putting the patient in one*.

Listen, chaps, the system’s broken. And if it’s broke, do fix it, right? Someone? But don’t sweep it under a four month–sized carpet - knowing that you might be caught red-handed, holding the broom.

* So long as they don’t mind. Remember to check that.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex. You can follow him on Twitter @DocCopperfield      

Rate this blog  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • Sad such obvious thoughts need stating in the first place!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is in the patient's charter, but it is imperative for proper diagnosis and treatment.
    So, so easy, if there were no patients at all.
    But here in NI, waiting lists for neurology, orthopaedics, dermatology, surgery [ even gall bladder pain] is 2 years. During which time we GPs see these poor patients 20 times, when with proper secondary care, we only need to see them once.
    Also, we deal with conditions and complications way above our pay grade and then get sued for making mistakes.
    This NHS is completely, utterly bonkers.
    And there are folks out there still think this is the best job in the world. Thank God for them, if they were like me, gone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What we as GP's need is direct access to investigations such as MRI CT etc. There are so many protocols in place to be able to decide which and when. After that decide with the patient where to go for best treatment. If NHS can't provide and the money following the patient use the private sector. They are the same doctors!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • 3
  • Rate
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder