Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

You must be demented to put ethics above QOF payments

  • Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Rate
  • Save

Being Chief Petty QOFficer, it falls to me to work out why our just-released QOF payment is, as usual, a bit below par. So I drill down into the data and, when I emerge, some hours later, it’s with the news that we have failed to mine one particularly rich seam. Our dementia prevalence is way off the national average, and some back-of-the-envelope number crunching shows that this alone has cost us a few thousand.

We know why. When those seek-and-destroy dementia DESs sprang up a few years back, we nobly resisted the get-rich-quick temptation in favour of a high minded notion that dementia screening has no validity.

Well, bugger that. As I now sit with my colleagues in the QOF debrief, all ethics have been ritually defenestrated. Number one on the agenda is, ‘Find more dements’. And number two is, ‘Then find some more’.

 We are looking for ideas, and there are plenty forthcoming. So. We could check every memory clinic referral against coded diagnoses to spot net-slippers. We could trawl all our residential homes on the basis that you don’t have to be demented to reside there, but it helps. We could ensure all repeats for anti-dementia drugs match with a dementia diagnosis, ditto for elderly on quetiapine, risperidone, lorazepam or any other psycho-lytic. We could search ‘memory problems’ in every patient’s journal narrative and code them as ‘dementia’ (subtext ‘possible’). We could make ‘Are you demented?’ our supplementary Friends and Family Question. We could get every patient to fill in a GPCOG as they sit in the waiting room. We could repeatedly ask, on the tannoy, ‘Do you know who, where and when you are?’ We could opportunistically stop and collect confused, wandering elderly people as we do our home visits. We could leave our front door open in the hope that the cortically atrophied will randomly stumble in and then be unable to find their way out. We could check empty rooms and cupboards. We could look under rocks.

We know there are dements out there. And we are coming for them, and our prevalence will rise and we will get the QOF points we deserve. I have been quickly minuting all this and, at last, I pause and look up at my colleagues who have been enthusiastically and breathlessly churning out these ideas, and continue to do so. I note that they have the distracted, wild-eyed and not entirely healthy look that, in patients, always prompts me to ask whether they drive. And I think, blimey, I’ve found some already.

Rate this blog  (4.79 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • This perfectly sums up the sheer madness OOF, huge amounts of time and effort wasted on recoding, exception reporting, and hunting down stragglers that drag down your figures.
    But whilst I would love to see the death of QOF, I don't trust the DoH with the money, which will disappear into vague new enhanced services or be "re-invested" in Primary Care, and a critical part of our income will vanish into thin air.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the most dangerous aspect of QOF is getting rid of it.

    Having been to meetings with NHSE the idea that monies would be re-cycled into global sum is not what NHSE want.

    The ACO type projects could see data collection increase in several orders of magnitude.
    I do not think GPC quite see this yet.

    The population based outcomes measures are so vague to be even worse then QOF. Yet this is the national plan within the 5 year forward view.

    I really hope people are keeping an eye of the NHSE New models of care work which is driving this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • in NI the money goes elsewhere............usually up an RHI burner..........Tony you really need to do an article on RHI (google RHI NI ash for cash)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Rate
  • Save

From: Copperfield

Dr Tony Copperfield is a jobbing GP in Essex with more than a few chips on his shoulder