Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Daily Mail's 'Mind Doctor' has missed the real GP story

  • Print
  • Comments (30)
  • Rate
  • Save

'It’s cruel and cowardly for GPs to turn their backs on the old’, screams the latest anti-GP clickbait, referring to the recent Emergency LMC conference vote in favour of separate contractual arrangements for nursing home visits. Being perennially slagged off in the Daily Mail is an unpleasant but inescapable part of the job, like the tawdry indignity of annual appraisal, or people who insist on showing you their phlegm. But it’s a bit special when the slagging comes from a colleague, in this case the junior psychiatrist and columnist Max Pemberton, who writes under the byline ’DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR’.

'I don’t go in for GP bashing’, says DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR, before proceeding to bash GPs for the rest of the article

I should confess that the matey ‘Dr Firstname’ styling beloved of media types grinds my gears somewhat; the only excuse to do this is either a) you’re a paediatrician or b) your surname is so polysyllabic it makes your clinic overrun if you have to spell it to someone. And not only is ‘THE MIND DOCTOR’ cheesier than a neglected phimosis but it also reeks of specialist self-justification; for comparison, imagine ‘DR PETE THE EVERYTHING DOCTOR’ at the top of this blog. Exactly.

'I don’t go in for GP bashing’, says DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR, before proceeding to bash GPs for the rest of the article. He goes on to explain how GPs should be ashamed to stop visiting nursing homes (er…we haven’t) on the grounds that we don’t even do it anyway (er…we do). Apparently, the only person who ever sees these patients at all is the MIND DOCTOR himself, multitasking his way through the nation’s care homes like a cross between Neighbours’ Karl Kennedy and a one-man CQC. I wish he’d come round my way; our old age psychiatrists can’t even seem to fill in a blood form. He finishes by stating that GPs should advocate for more funding to look after care home patients, which (cue your Le Fort level III facepalm, basic journalistic research fans!) is the precise point of the LMC motion that launched his tirade in the first place.

Now I don’t go in for psychiatrist-bashing, but I suppose we should be impressed DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR chose to write a column at all, rather than delegate the responsibility to a collection of minimally-qualified social workers, therapists and associated hangers-on. I’d have expected a poorly-worded, unsigned letter to arrive on the Mail editor’s desk four weeks after deadline day, saying “the Team have reviewed your urgent request for a column and decided it does not meet our criteria at this time”.

Hold on! I’d better be careful here or this blog might degenerate into an unjustified attack on an entire specialty based on prejudice, misunderstanding and clumsy stereotypes! Boy, wouldn’t that be embarrassing!

For all there is to dislike about his most recent article (hint: there’s a lot), DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR is clearly a conscientious guy who, on days he manages to grasp the stick by the correct end, is also a fine writer. Which makes it doubly disappointing to see him swallow the Mail Kool-Aid and miss the real story of the recent LMC conference - that General Practice is now in such crisis we have been forced to consider mass resignation. I dread to think how cruel and cowardly we will be judged when that happens.

Dr Pete Deveson is a GP in Surrey. You can follow him @PeteDeveson

Rate this blog  (4.8 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (30)

  • Hussain Gandhi

    Well reasoned article. This one, not Dr MAX THE MIND DOCTOR.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anyone care to guess what percentage of the populace actually understand that you are self-employed, let alone that you carry unlimited personal risk.

    Its dead.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Me thinks this is almost to the point he should be referred to the GMC as the article was gross misrepresentation of fact.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP's have shot themselves in the foot by voting for the right thing (separate contractual arrangement) but putting up a shoddy argument (complexity of patients and being annoyed at the disruptance) by the GPS speaking for the motion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like most portfolio'ites in order to pay the mortgage Dr Max has to do some rubbish jobs. His rubbish job is writing for a rubbish newspaper. He has to fill pages doing this rubbish job for a rubbish newspaper by writing rubbish articles. We should feel sorry for him.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Max is the one who should be ashamed, ashamed of the crappy service provided to patients by mental health services and the dumping on GPs on patients who desperately need the help of the "mind doctors".
    This article is cruel and cowardly but then so is THE DAILY MAIL.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Eloquently put! Bravo

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In defence of poor Dr Max "The Mind Doctor", he did write a good piece in the Daily Mail on the 6th of October 2015 which was sympathetic towards and supportive of the challenges faced by current day General Practice - Google "GP crisis UK" and the article should appear at the top of your search list.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mind the gap between his perception and actual reality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One of the most tiresome features of many Pulse comments is the reference to Daily Mail/Daily Wail - why is it that the profession (the BMA?) do not exhibit the professional public relations skills to meet the media debate head on and in a mature fashion enabling detailed issues to be debated thoroughly - is it because they don't think they should or they can't

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (30)
  • Rate
  • Save