Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Ms May, your attack on GPs reeks of dead cat

  • Print
  • Comments (13)
  • Rate
  • Save

It was a classic ‘dead cat’; one of the oldest PR tricks in the book. When in the midst of a flurry of negative news headlines, throw something on the table that stinks so much that it diverts discussion elsewhere.

Congratulations Prime Minister your dead cat certainly does stink

I can imagine how the meeting last Friday on the crisis in A&E departments in Number 10 went. ‘Prime Minister the old “Crisis? What crisis?” routine is wearing thin, we need something to change the narrative.’

So, the weekend’s newspapers were full of threats from Theresa May’s team that GPs were putting A&E departments under pressure as they were ‘failing to meet their commitments to keeping surgeries open longer’.

Practices would ‘lose funding’ if did not open 8 ‘til 8 seven days a week, unless they could demonstrate that the demand was not there. ‘Most GPs do a fantastic job, and have their patients’ interests firmly at heart,’ begins the statement. ‘However, it is increasingly clear that a large number of surgeries are not providing the access that patients need - and that patients are suffering as a result.’

There is so much wrong with that statement that I don’t know where to start. But I will.

Firstly, the whole premise that GP practices not opening seven days are somehow ‘not co-operating’ with the Government is completely wrong. The policy was never meant to be for every practice, as health secretary Jeremy Hunt said recently to Pulse that they were not ‘asking every practice to open seven days a week’ but is rather ‘looking for solutions to be offered by a network of practices’. And – for good or ill - a third of the country is now covered by these seven-day networks funded by a five-year programme set up by Ms May’s predecessor David Cameron. If she does not think this is moving quickly enough then perhaps she should look closer to home for the culprit and dig into her pocket for some more cash. 

Secondly, pilots of these schemes showed patients had better things to do on a Sunday and did not attend GP appointments, so if she is going to bang on about ‘patient’s interests’ then perhaps six-, rather than seven-day services are the answer. But having said that when we are looking at lengthening waiting times for appointments in core hours, just telling GPs to ‘do more’ is not really going to cut it.

Thirdly, official evaluations of the pilots have shown that seven-day GP access can reduce A&E attendances – by 14% on average – but it has no effect on on either emergency admissions or out-of-hours services and costs massively more. A recent report from Government auditors showed, extended hours cost 50% more than provision in core hours. Seven-day GP access will cost over £1.5bn by 2020. It this really value for money?

Lastly, Ms May’s government is scapegoating GP practices when it has miserably failed to uphold its own end of the bargain. It promised 5,000 extra GPs by 2020 and this year managed a few hundred more GP trainees and returners, but hardly the numbers needed to hit this target and staff those weekend and evening clinics. A Pulse analysis last year showed it will miss its target by more than half and the sheer folly of this recent attack – sanctioned by Ms May herself – is that it will make it much harder for her to extend access.

Her sacrificial moggy may have served its function this weekend, but the longer-term damage to GP morale will be much greater. For short-term political gain, Ms May has pushed many more GPs towards the exit door.

So congratulations Prime Minister your dead cat certainly does stink. But not for the reasons you think it does and perhaps for longer than you intended.

Nigel Praities is editor of Pulse

Rate this blog  (4.9399999999999995 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (13)

  • IN 2011, THE TORIES CUT FUNDING FOR GP EXTENDED HOURS BY ALMOST 40% FROM £3.01 PP TO £1.90PP.

    WHY AREN'T THE MEDIA ASKING HUNT AND HIS "CRIMINAL CRONIES" TO COMMENT ON THIS.
    I WOULD POKE A MICROPHONE AT HIM AND INSIST HE EXPLAIN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

    WHY HAS PULSE MAGAZINE NOT HIGHLIGHTED THIS TO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA?????

    ???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its good to know that our prime minister is a weapons grade idiot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Last man standing
    The mainstream media are happily housed in the collective colon of large corporation, conservative party and self interest.
    Facts, experts and compassion for readership don't really do it for the DM, Sun , Torygraph etc.
    Lets hope readership can discern fact from fiction.
    Its nice that we live in a free country.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Listen Mr Editor-you have huge power!

    I have tried to highlight to the media about the historic Tory "cuts" to GP extended hours (the general public would be very angry if they knew this) but, of course, cannot get the Tory Media to acknowledge this...remember they need to protect their "friend" Hunt.

    All it takes is a phone call from you to a paper this is not a Tory puppet say The Daily Mirror (forget Hunt's ridiculous friends) and the news might get out to the public who deserve to know the truth.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is t true that we see 90% of all face to face consultations on 7 .5 % of the NHS budget. If so, why as no one from GPC or Pulse actually said it.
    Does the PM wish us to see 100 % of all patient consultations on the same budget or even 9% of the budget.
    Why has no one high lighted this huge % of consults on such meager resources in any interview eg with radio 4.
    Just saying we GPs are working hard is no use at all. Sure, everyone says it.
    Give them the figures. Let them sit up. AND tell them that hey, we can and will pull the plug.
    Is this the reason the the GPC did not ballot ? Fr this bashing?
    Frankly, I wonder whom the GPC actually stand for?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @anon you've hit the nail on the head. The truth is no one, especially the GPC, has the bollocks to tell the media this. Look at how useless they've been in supporting the junior doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I meant look at how useless the BMA has been supporting the junior doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The fate of general practice is being beta tested in Northern Ireland . If our colleagues in NI resign we will be pushed to do the same. Withholding of funds and criticism is simply constructive dismissal writ large.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just heard Mrs May's address on BBC and can't believe my years. The lack of tact, the arrogance and the hostile note pointing that Europe is going to lose out on Brexit is incomprehensible. We have a PM who has no diplomacy and while she was ok in a 'Home' office, she should not have ventured out into Europe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The interesting bit was the start when she mentioned ' We are European' and then went on to point to different culture and political model which UK lost on integration with Europe. Complete blah blah blah with nothing new added. Sounded like double dutch and really hard to comprehend what's on her mind. She was more eloquent in abusing GPs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (13)
  • Rate
  • Save