Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs see society's ills sooner than anyone else

  • Print
  • Comments (15)
  • Rate
  • Save

As the socio-political landscape shifts under our feet, openly mocking the inadequacy of 24-hour news to keep track, it becomes more and more apparent that the events in the UK over the last six weeks – the most regrettable consequence of which has been the defection of Pulse’s best columnist - have been some time in gestation.  

Teachers, GPs, experts – people are sick of them, and it shows

None of it should have come as any surprise to any of us, yet I’m sure I wasn’t the only one left bewildered by the Brexit aftermath. But the cues were there, right in front of our eyes.

I work in a bi-monthly gerries clinic under the guidance of a consultant who can only be described as a totem of medicine, a ninja-genius armed to the teeth with all of the old-school idiosyncrasies that Modernising Medical Careers was designed to beat out of its charges. The kind of big beast who would casually tell management to get the hell out of his ward, and in the very next beat make a diagnosis of PSP just by watching the patient eat a yoghurt (this actually happened).

Aside from enjoying the opportunity to soak up these arcane secrets it’s a welcome change in scenery. It feels a little bit like how people describe going to New Zealand: a portal to another time, a different place where people are respectful, polite, yes perhaps even a little deferential. It’s a cocoon from the rest of the hospital which is a dead-eyed, corporate place, where as an SHO I remember feeling straightjacketed, my learning and creativity snuffed out by mind-numbing protocol.

Other than the intellectual challenge that, let’s face it, isn’t always available in general practice, it’s just great how nice people are to the staff. Please, thank you, smiles, that sort of thing; a far-cry from the scowls and tantrums we too often endure in primary care. Yes, some of that is generational, but the halo effect even extends to relatives who you could well imagine acting out in a different environment.

The truth is that the disarming effect of the big shiny building still overpowers modern societal foibles. Hospital and religious buildings must be some of the few remaining institutions in which people still pay respect to rules and each other, where selfies are anathema and people are willingly put a lid on their raging ego. 

Out in the community, of course, it’s different. GPs are one of society’s bellwethers and our consultation rooms are exquisitely sensitive barometers of prevailing trends. We see social problems sooner and more acutely than almost anyone else. Loneliness. Isolation. Anxiety. Financial and educational poverty. For years we’ve witnessed the creep of a general dissatisfaction, a souring of attitudes settled over our little empires like Victorian smog, pervading every nook and cranny of society regardless of man or means. Teachers, GPs, experts – people are sick of them, and it shows.

The Brexit leaders’ belching endorsement of anti-intellectualism cannot have come as any surprise to us in the swampy low-lands, because this way of thinking has been apparent for some time. People are unhappy and this unhappiness manifests in myriad different ways. Add in the deeply ingrained and very British trait of a natural distrust for authority, and there goes both baby and bathwater.

We could speculate as to the various reasons all day, but even within the profession we have suffered for this erosion of authority and laxity of the traditional hierarchical structure. It makes me nostalgic for a time when the big beasts roamed the Earth.

Dr Karim Adab is a GP in Manchester

Rate this blog  (3.92 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (15)

  • The problem is that corporate/government control, with resultant decline in autonomy, is spreading its tentacles across the world. It just hasn't managed to reach some of the far-flung places yet.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What absolute nonsense. You're equating those who voted for a return of our democratic autonomy, with those who are disenchanted at the austerity measures of a Tory government. A GP, of all people, should not be making generalisations. The premise of your article is true, that we see the ills pretty quickly, compared with most professions, but then applying your own 'Remain' agenda, makes the article worthless

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In agreement with 10:54 and slightly irritated by those generalisations!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've not work d in hospitals for a long time but fondly remember the types of consultants he refers to. Protocols are indeed a noose around the neck of clinical accumen and stifle learning.
    I disagree with the perceived mood of general practice. I've done it a long time and still benefit from the respect and personal knowledge of patients that hospitals have long since lost.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • anonymous 10:54
    So you don't believe that ANYONE voted leave to stick it to those in power??
    And because of your certainty you dismiss the rest as "nonsense".
    I bet you're a joy to have a pint with!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In absolute disagreement with 10:54, you are equally guilty of generalisation, and in fact you are making a far more specific case for how people voted than the article did, and therefore in the process making a broader generalisation. Your argument is that all who voted for Brexit did so to see a return of the perceived loss of democratic autonomy. You also mention austerity, something the article did not.

    I think the general point of the article is that as GPs we pick up on the zeitgeist very early, and that currently that is a feeling of general dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs.
    To then draw a line between that and the Brexit vote is hardly an enormous leap - people feel the need for change, and they were only given one opportunity to seek change and they took it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Richard Mitchell
    Agreed

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In my opinion we're all too quick to give our opinions . Oh the irony.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm uncomfortable with the general vibe of this article. There are a myriad of reasons why a majority of people in the UK voted for BREXIT. It's simplistic and actually pretty patronising to lump it all into a general 'people are fed up with experts'...as if anyone who was an 'expert' wouldn't have been quite so stupid? And if you find GP so 'low brow' perhaps you need to think a little harder about how you approach what your doing, you might find it ain't actually so simple if you made more of an effort to engage that enormous brain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm 10.54.
    At no point did I say NO ONE voted leave to stick it to those in power??
    Just as I didn't say EVERYONE who voted remain, did so cos they're scared by all the scaremongering. My point, which, Richard Mitchell, and others have missed, is that you CAN'T generalise any group like that, and that applying a political agenda, to a fact of life, that GPs see ills early, rather than espousing on why, makes the article meaningless

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (15)
  • Rate
  • Save