This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Perhaps better feedback is the key to improving GP trainee morale

  • Print
  • 7
  • Rate
  • Save

Great GP debate logo

Over the New Year, I was in a pub having a family lunch. Our student waiter scurried around with an unwavering smile. Despite the cramped table and slow service, he somehow managed to infect us with his cheeriness. As we thanked him and got up to leave, he added, 'If you leave a TripAdvisor review, can you mention my name? I get a free pint!'

As I did just that, I thought back to what had made the difference that afternoon. It struck me then that it had been the attitude of the staff. Was there something more to it than the prospect of a free pint in return for serving with a smile? Was it the ease with which their customers could give feedback having an impact on their morale? It got me thinking - given the perilous plummet in morale among GP trainees, could a radical overhaul of the feedback system for trainees be part of the solution?

Could a shift in feedback cement over some of the deeper cracks?

Feedback is a powerful tool. Think back to when you were at school, when it was in constant supply. You couldn’t dodge the steady stream of evaluation, and every goalpost you set and shifted was in response to the noise of feedback around you.

Soon you were thrown into a medical school pond, indistinguishable from the rest of your shoal. The feedback stream weakened, thinning out to exam hurdles. And then you became a doctor. The richness of feedback was diluted further still - passing yet more exams, the fudge of e-portfolio assessments, and savouring off-the-cuff remarks from patients and colleagues.

Of course we’re not in it for the thanks, and this isn’t about TripAdvisor ratings. It’s quite right that the nature of feedback we receive changes as our career progresses. You could argue we need it less with increasing experience. Or, alternatively, does a pervading lack of awareness of our value and of our shortcomings become more of a hindrance as the complexity of our work grows? 

It reminded me of a book I’d read recently, recommended by a fantastic paediatric consultant Bob Klaber, called ‘Thanks for the Feedback’. The authors assert that broadly, feedback come in three forms: appreciation (thanks), evaluation (here’s where you stand) and coaching (there’s a better way to do this).

Early on in our careers, we get fed a healthy dose of all three from both patients and colleagues. But as we progress, it seems to water down to leave a calculated emphasis on the evaluative, without an inbuilt system for truly encouraging the other two forms. 

Take the evaluative component first. Arguably, tools like the Family and Friends test, and websites like NHS Choices make it easy for our patients to tell us if we’re up to scratch. From colleagues, we have the flurry of e-portfolio ‘work-based placed assessments’ and supervisor forms, circling above our heads like invisible hawks that we can’t bat away as we try to get on with the job. I know they’d swoop down on me if I was unsafe, but how meaningful is that feedback?

Next, the appreciation. It’s been the little things from my patients, like the 92-year-old man who gave me his last Werther’s Original, or the scribbled thank you drawing from a 6-year-old slipped under my door, that came to mean more to me than even they realised. If spontaneous gestures of gratitude make such a difference, can we make that easier? Other services we interact with, like shops and customer service lines, make it clear how we can leave feedback for specific employees, without seemingly fishing for compliments.

For colleagues, every good consultant I’ve ever worked for has one thing in common: they know the power of thanking their team. At a time when we rely so heavily on the discretionary effort of staff, regular injections of appreciation can have lasting repercussions. We’ve chipped away at the system so it’s now easier to raise the alarm when we spot a mistake. But what about an equally accessible system for positive feedback, a ‘gratitude Datix’ of sorts? 

Finally, the coaching. We might presume patients can only give us evaluative and appreciative feedback, but I’m sure we can all think of examples where they’ve offered more. I won’t ever forget the gentleman who, through stubbornly refusing to take a statin month after month, coached me through a valuable lesson on patient-centred decision making.

For our colleagues, I think the in-built inclination to nurture juniors that came with the historic 120 hour weeks, tied over gaps that are now resurfacing. What if we could reinvest the time spent on box-ticking evaluation in truly coaching trainees instead? Could that be a step towards re-engaging our disillusioned juniors?

Perhaps the NHS could look at how other industries provide feedback. IBM and GE, for example, both revamped their performance review system by using crowd sourced suggestions from employees. This led to an abandoning of the annual performance review, which was viewed as an exercise in bureaucracy instead of an agent of change, in place of a new app-based system. It lets employees set shorter-term goals, with more frequent feedback at their request, a broader scoring system, and an unrelenting emphasis on coaching.

Could a shift in the frequency, type and quality of feedback we give to junior doctors cement over some of the deeper cracks as we move forward?

Leave some constructive feedback in the comments, and you might get a free pint.

Dr Nishma Manek is a GP trainee in London. You can follow her on Twitter @nishmanek

This blog is part of our ‘Great GP Debate’ season. If you would like to write a blog on how you see the future of general practice, then please email the Editor at

Rate this blog  (2.4 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (7)

  • Nishma, I'm sat here reading this whilst eating lunch in my car, having just done one Appraisal and about to another.

    I think you will find a good Trainer or Appraiser will be coaching you without you realising it.

    But food for thought - well done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are the facebook generation so keen on "feedback".
    Can we no longer survive without affirmation from others.
    Who really wants another "app"?
    NhS choices shows what feedback is-can't get an appointment, can't get antibiotics...
    A good week for me is one devoid of any formal feedback! And don't get me started on the waste of time that is apprails & revalidation!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When one comes to that epiphany moment of posing the question "WTF have I done with my life?" as the reality of what lies ahead of you when you achieve your career choice assails upon your consciousness in a fashion which cannot be ignored, ones morale will gasp its agonal last. In terms of feedback, the good old method of ritual humiliation on the wardround would pretty rapidly aid the process of correcting ones deficiencies. The 'light touch' approach has, I think, been taken too far.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Feedback feedback feedback . It more like 'death by feedback ' with the current emphasis on this . It seems like the entire self worth of a doctor and indeed their entire career is now judged on flippant feedback forms that have to be collected from patients and colleagues . Most people dont even respond to this garbage yet you must collect x number of responses or the revalidation stasi will not be happy

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Voluntary feedback mechanisms can be a wonderful educational tool for those who desire it.
    Unfortunately we have compulsory feedback, which for most busy GPs is a worthless, time wasting hoop we have to jump through (revaluation), and a vindictive stick our patients can beat us with (NHS Choices).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am all feedbacked out. I get loads to fill out and I just give everybody top marks and say they are good. If you tick the right hand column (which is usually top marks) you can do it in a few seconds without having to think.

    Feedback is a valid tool if people have time and inclination to do it. But nobody has the time therefore it is an invalid tool.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I once diagnosed bacterial meningitis over the phone talking to the patient's father. He dropped the copy of the pathology report he'd got in at reception for me. That was years ago and I still remember it.

    The rest of the feedback, whether appraisals, 1:1s is meaningless noise. And having worked in an environment where the app based feedback was undertaken this invariably descended into people trying to up each other's profiles.

    The patient who refused statins - the lesson you've learned is patient centred medicine. Do you know if he's had a cardiovascular event the statin might have prevented?

    Saying there should be "higher quality" feedback is meaningless since no one would disagree and it is not clear what this would entail. I am sure we would also all like world peace and no want but without the detail, it is pretty meaningless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • 7
  • Rate
  • Save