Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

How ‘grassrootsy’ are you?

  • Print
  • Comments (1)
  • Rate
  • Save

By virtue of being an outspoken individual (I accept gobby and stroppy too), I find myself increasingly meeting the great and the good of medical politics.

But who are these people toiling in the soil of general practice?

It’s good to be able to meet people in the flesh, and also to meet those who are working away behind the scenes and whose input is less well known.

But I have to admit that I sometimes meet people and  think: ‘Really? You’re representing us? Are you sure?’

I guess this is inevitable in such a diverse profession, but all the rhetoric is always that the leaders of this or that group are busy ‘engaging with grassroots GPs’.

But who are these people toiling in the soil of general practice? As with the ‘hard-working people’ or ‘the squeezed middle’ often cited by politicians, I have no clear idea who is meant by the ‘grassroots’.

I’d argue anyone working most of their sessions in clinical practice and who doesn’t have any role in medical politics or a formal organisation qualifies as a grassroots GP.

But are GP partners less ‘grassrootsy’ under this definition? Are you less worthy of representation if you have decided to take time out of the practice to train or carry out appraisals?

Indeed, I wonder if I still qualify for help myself. The online group I am part of – GP Survival – has grown dramatically, and I now find myself sitting on my LMC and the BMA sessional subcommittee. Does that mean I’m no longer sought after in the battle for GP support?

It feels a bit like our leaders are so busy in the playground shouting ‘my gang is better than your gang’ that the real questions are being lost. Somewhere in the quest to be the ultimate grassroots GP group, or the body that listens to and represents GPs best, we seem to have forgotten what we are doing.

We all represent the profession. Different facets, different groups, but all of us. To be bickering about it in public (as has happened recently on social media) does our profession a disservice. As any parent knows, you can fight like hell behind closed doors, but when the kids are watching, keep a united front. The Government must be rubbing its hands together with glee as we snipe at each other.

I’ll admit I can be a vocal critic when the need arises – I’ve probably been as guilty as the next person of perpetuating this. But as the pressure continues to rise in general practice and we all struggle to stay afloat, here’s an idea. A proverbial olive branch.

Let’s all get together in a room – with cake and alcohol – and let’s thrash it out. Once and for all, let’s bury the hatchet somewhere other than in the heads of our perceived rivals, and agree to disagree out of sight.

Every GP group has a place. Every GP group represents someone or it wouldn’t exist. Let’s find some common ground before the subsidence lays waste to us all.

I’m up for it. And maybe the next time someone asks: ‘But who represents grassroots GPs?’, they might actually get a helpful answer.

Dr Zoe Norris is a GP in Hull

Rate this blog  (3.04 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (1)

  • Vinci Ho

    My message to you is don't be too harsh to yourself after all . Politics is about human beings , groups of human beings in fact . If you traced back my comment on this platform about your group when it was first formed, I was wishing you guys best to keep your identity as you got bigger(congratulate on that). But as I always say about an establishment and its leaders , the bigger the establishment gets , the more 'baggages' you will have to ensure its best interest and 'survival' (ironically , your group is called survival).
    Representation is an indirect democracy if the representatives are elected in that group which will have to face one day the dichotomy of maintaining the best interest of the enlarging or enlarged group versus individual ambition(s). That is just the life and reality of politics. Yes, you still have ballots , referendum etc for act of direct democracy but with also the risk of turning subdivided groups going against each other. Clearly , we have witnessed the 'side effect' of further dividing the country into 'in' and 'out' groups after the EU referendum .Truth is once you are representing a 'group' , you have to deal with so many personalities as well as agendas inside the group. Just like superheroes , there is always a 'price' for a leadership .
    ''...with great power there must also come -- great responsibility!'' Ben Parker from Spider Man

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (1)
  • Rate
  • Save