This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

I think I'm allergic to allergies

  • Print
  • Comments (14)
  • Rate
  • Save

‘I had diarrhoea and vomiting last week, I know it’s a food allergy and I want a blood test.’

After I had manually reduced my TM joints (my jaw had gaped like a yawning hippo in utter disbelief) I set about the monumentally difficult task of re-educating this patient.

It was difficult to know where to begin. Judging by her astonishing ignorance, at about the age of 12, presumably her teachers had given up.

No, that is harsh, but food allergies are like pairs of denim jeans, in that they always seem to be in fashion and everybody wants one.

The language people use when talking about allergies has also changed. Note she didn’t ‘think’ she had an allergy, nor had she come for me to confirm the diagnosis. She had already decided what was wrong with her, and my role was reduced to being the provider of the blood test forms to find what she was allergic to.

I’m not sure when poor old viruses went out of fashion, but nobody wants a common old stomach bug anymore. It has to be something more exotic and only an allergy will fit the bill. Using the trouser analogy, viruses are the bright orange flares of the illness world.

I think in our largely secular society, ‘belief’ in an allergy, for some people, has replaced the faith in the existence of a superior being that many people held in less enlightened times.

It’s also easy to see the appeal of some alternative practitioner sitting you down in their joss stick-fragranced therapy room and spending an hour telling you how they can ‘cure’ your ‘allergy’ with some herbal tablets they just happen to have in stock, to the accompaniment of whale music.

For those without any scientific education, you can see why this is more palatable than a rushed five minutes with a harassed GP telling you your illness is due to a tiny thing called a virus and that there is no treatment for it.

There is one allergy that would bring a smile to my face though - a mass intolerance to blue rosettes and public school educated millionaires in about four years.

Dr David Turner is a GP in west London 

Rate this blog  (3.16 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (14)

  • @5.22pm

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Advanced apologies as my comment is not directly related to the primary focus of the article (which I enjoyed)...but seeing as it's started....

    There is about as much evidence for the Big Bang theory of creation as there is for God as a creator.

    Using standard scientific theory, the probability of millions of particles "randomly" coming together from which the universe as we know it being created, would be so minuscule the hypothesis would be rejected outright. It's nonsense, sorry I mean its "enlightened nonsense."

    Science has proved the universe is finite. Finite entities have a beginning and an end.
    How did something finite create itself?
    However far one wishes to extrapolate time, at some point something came from nothing, how is this possible within the laws of physics as we know them?

    Another old chestnut, religion and science are contradictory I.e you can only accept one or the other.
    There is only one strand on science that religion fails to accept, that is the THEORY of evolutionary biology, which itself is debated upon within the scientific community. Religion does not contradict the entire paradigm of science.
    In fact many great scientists were people of religious belief.

    If and when secularists are able to create something from nothing, I will happily take their evidence. Until then please respect a persons right to believe in a creator, which as aforementioned is an equally if not more likely explanation.

    Kind regards

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @7.47pm:
    very well put. & respectful to boot!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I gave the author five stars even though I did not find the article particularly funny. I did enjoy his final quip at our present 'Bullington boy' masters. Also, it seems to me that the author is neither an 'allergy or God denier', merely a person/clinician exasperated by the tediousness of promoters of those topics?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (14)
  • Rate
  • Save