This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Is academic prowess the best predictor of a future GP?

  • Print
  • 5
  • Rate
  • Save

It’s the time of year when school pupils find out their exam grades, on which their life trajectories seem - at least at this time of year - mapped out as a result. Cue the usual debates about whether this year’s exams were more easy or difficult, and for us medic folks, whether academic prowess (as measured by our exam system) is the best means by which to initially select students for medicine.

Rural schools are faced with the same fragility as smaller-scale GP practices

First off, let me be clear that I have every sympathy for admission deans who await an undiminishing influx of UCAS applications for medicine. The sheer numbers require some initial process by which to reduce the pile of hopeful doctors, whatever motivations underlies their enthusiasm. I haven’t come up with a clear alternative, so who am I to comment?

However, I do have a perspective as a city boy turned country lad. In our practice, like many others, we try to do our bit wherever possible to give local school pupils the opportunity to observe work in healthcare - not to persuade, but to inform, to allow adequate consideration, and to let those who are still keen have a fighting chance when they’re asked about work observation at interview.

This is important because GP recruitment remains hugely challenging in rural practice (as it is becoming in all practices). We know that medical students who are originally from a rural area are more likely to return to rural areas with their qualified service. And we know that even though it feels our profession is under escalated, unjustified attack, there remains something uniquely attractive about (rural) general practice that offers the intellectual stimulation that our brightest aspire to.

My perspective includes local pupils who do exceedingly well in their exams, but who don’t quite hit the AAAAA full house that seems to be increasingly standard for admissions criteria. Rural schools are faced with the same fragility as smaller-scale GP practices: staff shortages have a bigger impact if your only, let’s say physics, teacher leaves mid-term.

One promising student - who had a career in medicine in mind - self-taught the rest of one of his Highers when our local school experienced exactly this problem. His AAAAB was arguably a greater achievement than someone who’d achieved five As in a more resilient school. Yet his application to several medical schools failed at the first hurdle.

Amidst the unenviable task of whittling applications down to a feasible shortlist, I wonder if there is more to be done by our medical schools in fulfilling their accountability to the needs of our country’s demographics.

Dr David Hogg is a GP on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. You can follow him on Twitter @davidrhogg

Rate this blog  (4.6 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (5)

  • Excellent article. We need a new type of admissions process where personality and empathy skills are valued in equal measure as academic achievement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not helped by the overseas processes. I had 2 med students working for me over the summer from the UK who didn't get offer a place but have gone to study in eastern europe in order to qualify. Both very bright and now battling with the system to get back to the UK as their excellent courses include the F1 equivalent and now getting straight into an F2 post is proving very tricky.

    The report for HEE - Could do better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please dont knock down the achiever of the five AAAAAs because he/she went to a better school. Those pupils still work hard. What are you suggesting? positive discrimination? - the government needs to get its act together invest in schools instead of wars and other rubbish.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would disagree

    Academic prowess is the best predictor of resilience and flexibility to acquire skills required for any branch of medicine.

    The evidence is that had formed the basis of all doctors until the early 2000's.
    Since mid 2000's empathy and other subjective measures have been used for medical school entry far more extensively.

    The outcome is a generation of young doctors who are not coping with the harsher aspects of NHS life.

    I see many a young doctor (including my younger siblings) just not coping with hospital jobs or full time GP work.

    Yes the workload has increased but there is a clear generation shift.

    The change in selection of dr's happened - we are now seeing the results.

    The government could never deliver its fantasy of limited hours training.
    Ultimately it is young dr's who struggle because of our false promises.

    Some of the most guilty are the GP academics who have taken over some medical schools and medical education departments. They have been a disaster and transforming medicine into a social science!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets face it - the feminisation of medicine has been a disaster. previously boffin types would work ridiculous hours with little thought of their own family/home life and be emotionally detached from the crying patients so that they could carry on regardless. Once the "female" side came in - touchy feeling circle sitting sandal wearing - everyone goes part time or drops out - needs a day to reflect on each consultation then write it in their e-porfolio. the profession looses its status - its earning potential..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • 5
  • Rate
  • Save