Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Is the partnership model really obsolete?

  • Print
  • Comments (22)
  • Rate
  • Save

The government has been urged to explore a totally salaried GP service, after a House of Lords report declared the traditional partnership model to be not fit for purpose. There’s a bittersweet irony in being accused of obsolescence by a bunch of dudes who literally go to work dressed in dead stoats because they looked criss on Edward III. It’s like being fat-shamed by Augustus Gloop, or done for speeding by Jamiroquai.

Thankfully the RCGP chair Dr Helen Stokes-Lampard was quick to condemn the report, with the RCGP proclaiming that the 'GP Partnership model is still relevant and brings important benefits for patients'. I’m not sure if she’s read the whole thing, because paragraph 72 quotes one, erm, Dr Helen Stokes-Lampard saying the partnership model of general practice is 'not likely to be fit for the long-term future'. It’s not a good look for a medical politician to start a public beef with herself. Naivete, or a Robert The Bruce Senior tactic? The new chair is such a canny performer I’m saddened to waver toward the latter.

The report’s conclusion that 'the traditional small business model of general practice is no longer fit for purpose' is a direct quote from another RCGP grandee, former chair Dr Clare Gerada, whose Hurley Group is about as far removed from a small business model as Wall Street is from Main Street. Dr Gerada, who self-identifies as a grassroots GP, employs over 200 salaried GPs, nurses and managers. Sadly, none of them made it to the Lords to give their views on the joys of working in a salaried system.

Meanwhile, just as another Hurley Group partner, NHS England Primary Care Director Arvind Madan, was urging us all to copy the Hurley model and federate into super practices, came the somewhat awkward revelation that one of their sites has been put into special measures.  There’s some Michelin-star schadenfreude to be savoured here, but I’m giving the Hurley the benefit of the doubt, since we all know CQC ratings are about as replicable as a Magic 8-ball in a tumble dryer.

I’m gonna lay my cards on the table: despite the parlous state of GP right now, I like the partnership model. It gives me a say in how I work, and it pays better than any salaried job I ever had. So I think it’s a crying shame that the Lords have concluded it should be chucked out after hearing only from those whose business interests perfectly insulate them from the loss of income and independence that its passing will bestow on the rest of us. 

Dr Pete Deveson is a GP in Surrey. You can follow him on Twitter @PeteDeveson

Rate this blog  (4.87 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (22)

  • Healthy Cynic

    If you wanted General practice to collapse tomorrow, you would remove the partners. We are the glue that currently holds the whole system together.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One of the best blogs in the past 12 months. Congratulations Pete.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nhsfatcat

    The foxes are advising on chicken coop design.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well said! The partnership model is live and well and delivering efficient good quality health care in Exeter. Some areas may need a new model but we are thriving here

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Many small practices especially in City Centres are now closing.
    There are 2 reasons for this 1) No new GPs to replace those retiring, 2) No longer financially viable.
    The partnership model is definitely NOT working in these areas.
    So from the patient's point of view the poor, less privileged patients are now very badly served by this model.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Spot on.
    The model is not defunct, just underfunded and undervalued.
    Stokes-Lampard needs to grow a spine and remember who she is supposed to be representing, Gerarda needs to just go away and stop pretending to be a voice of the profession, and Madan needs to choose between being a partner at Hurley or being a Medical Director for NHSE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thank you for writing paragraph 3

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brilliant article in that it exposes the breath-taking hypocrisy of our professions 'grandees'; well said PD.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Superb.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So we are to replace continuity of care with faceless corporate primary care! Invest in us and we will continue to perform as we always have done, this report is purely ammo for the private healthcare takeover agenda by the Torres, Clare Gerada hang your head in shame for letting us down so very badly by your performance!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.

  • Print
  • Comments (22)
  • Rate
  • Save