Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

It's time to throw open the surgery doors

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Rate
  • Save

Last Autumn I was able to attend a presentation given by the charismatic Vince Barry, CEO of Pegasus Healthcare in Canterbury, New Zealand. For those of you lucky enough to still remain quarantined from the pyretic spread of the Multispecialty Community Provider, the Canterbury tale is one oft-quoted with evangelical zeal, albeit with good reason. I too was impressed, not only by  his Kiwi plain speaking, but also the detail of what is clearly a well developed service that just seems to work. That they really had thought about things, in contrast to the baseless, euphemistic guff that we in the NHS are subjected in every cycle of the perpetual wooden-folding-beach-seat-reconfiguration-period. 

For all that we are solo, brilliant mavericks, we cannot do this alone

The difference is that in Canterbury they started with the clinicians first and deliberately worked outwards. They realised that GPs had more to offer when freed from artificial physical and bureaucratic restraints, allowing their influence to permeate throughout the community, linking with local leaders and resources to understand more about what their population needed and how to deliver it. They put GPs and secondary care doctors in the same room to work things out - ‘robust conversations’ followed, but it put names to faces, isolated some perverse behaviours that were affecting patient flow and helped to iron them out. They managed – somehow – to corral GPs together and trusted them with the controls. 

This isn’t rocket surgery. Medics typically herd like cats, GPs like tasmanian devils. But we are natural leaders, problem solvers and, despite what hysterical harpies of the gutter press might have you believe, still an a trusted and respected local authority. Where other support structures have been undermined, have been allowed to atrophy and fail, people continue to place great value in our counsel. We are good at sorting things out. Good at sorting out the personal, the structural, the micro and the macro. It is our job. But for all that we are solo artists – brilliant, maverick, uncompromising - we are even better in a band.

In Canterbury they recognised this. Almost unbelievably, clinicians were trusted to know exactly what was best for their patients. There was dialogue, of course, but they eschewed the fashionable folly of co-production and people were quite happy to let the experts get on with their jobs. It was quite telling that, at the meeting, the attending patient representative remarked how patient groups just wouldn’t stand for this, an inversion of the natural order. But this is what we’re up against over here. The idea that someone else actually might know best is almost irreconcilable with the modern British psyche; a version of the Dunning-Kruger effect set loose by social media and now rampant in every conceivable conversation.

With this in mind, my concern is that those who are currently driving change focus too narrowly on the what without acknowledging the how.  We cannot just cherry pick our favourite bits from around the globe and expect to replicate them perfectly under entirely different social and political conditions. Also, for all the protestations that this change ought to be organic and clinician-led, the conversation is still dominated by evidence-based fluff and Powerpoint platitudes. GPs, who should be at the very heart of any reorganisation, are often cast as obstructive, absent, disinterested. We know that we love to grumble but also that the magic happens through collaboration, when we are in the room, talking with colleagues. We need to harness that energy between us, to dissipate the daily frustrations that block out the sun, to nourish the good ideas which wither and die in isolation.

Co-operation is key if we are to make anything of this state of flux. It’s time to throw open the surgery doors.

Dr Karim Adab is a GP in Manchester

Rate this blog  (4.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (5)

  • I think this is what CCGs were meant to achieve.
    Unfortunately the reality is that each idea to take services in house for a more 'integrated' approach is watered now and neutered by a raft of KPIs and bureaucracy such that the end result is a hoop jumping chore rather than an opportunity to improve care.
    The truth is that those with the money, politicians and administrators, just don't trust us. This institutional mistrust of individual professionalism is the legacy of the politico-journalistic-think-tank-consultancy approach that started with Blair and has continued with his heir, Cameron.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | GP Partner20 May 2016 9:53am -
    "This institutional mistrust of individual professionalism is the legacy of the politico-journalistic-think-tank-consultancy approach that started with Blair and has continued with his heir, Cameron."

    Very well put.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very well written

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 22 years ago I was passionate about improving health care and became involved in PCT (precursor of CCGs) management. The PCT CEO had a quiet chat with me and said that the chance of being able to change much was negligible. He went on to say that to in order to flourish I needed to realise that it was about being a yes man for those above me. About right...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Evil flourishes when the good stand by and do nothing

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Rate
  • Save