Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Twelve reasons people take an anti-vaccine stance

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

Vaccinations are generally considered to be amongst the biggest achievement in the history of medicine. They must have prevented billions of diseases and saved millions of lives. Yet, for many years, there has been a vocal movement protesting against immunizations. A recent article1by A Kata summarises the notions and tactics of these activists. The author identified the following 'common anti-vaccination tropes' from searching relevant sites on the internet.

1)      I am not anti-vaccine, I am pro-safe vaccine.

2)      Vaccines are toxic.

3)      Vaccines should be 100% safe.

4)      You cannot prove that vaccines are safe.

5)      Vaccines did not save us.

6)      Vaccines are not natural.

7)      I am an expert in my own child.

8)      Galileo was persecuted too.

9)      Science has been wrong before.

10)  So many people simply cannot be wrong.

11)  You must be in the pocket of BIG PHARMA.

12)  I do no believe that the problems after vaccination occur coincidentally.

And what has this to do with alternative medicine? I think, the connection is twofold. Firstly, many of the arguments resonate with those of alternative medicine enthusiasts aimed at their critics. Secondly, there is a mountain of evidence to show that many practitioners of alternative medicine are part of the anti-vaccine movement2.

References

1. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - an overview of tactics and troops used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 2011;Dec 13. [Epub ahead of print].

2. Schmidt K, Ernst E. Welcome to the lion's den - CAM therapists and immunisations. Focus Altern Complement Ther 2005; 10:98-100.

Readers' comments (5)

  • Mark Struthers

    Disgraceful!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why is this disgraceful? These are legitimate concerns.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    Ernst and his attitudes are disgraceful, not the genuine concerns about vaccination

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I understand now Mark, I'm frankly shocked that this article contains so little information and facts. There is so much more to this debate than Ernst has written. The whole vaccination system is corrupt and our children are being used as guinea pigs, vaccines aren't tested and babies, children and adults are dying because of vaccines. Any Doctor that comes out and tells the truth is struck off. Was this Ernst man paid for this dreadful article, where he cites one of his OWN 'studies' as a reference. Laughable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    Thank you Ruth. All the comments seem to have been recently removed from the Ernst blogs. Ernst is not interested in debate and certainly not in debating vacccine safety or efficacy. Deleting dissent is pudding proof of that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save