Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Ministers preach transparency for GPs – so why are they watering down the FOI Act?

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

While the Jeremy Hunt expects the health service – and especially GPs – to be more transparent, his Government is looking at how to make itself even less accountable.

At Pulse we pride ourselves on our investigative journalism and, just last month, we broke the story that CCGs were offering incentives for GPs to cut urgent cancer referrals, using the Freedom of Information Act.

Previously, we have also used the FOI Act to show the extent that CCGs were putting services out to competition, the rising number of practices threatened with closure and significant cuts to community mental health services.

These – and similar investigations – can affect real change and make sure public money is being spent as it should.

However, the Government is looking to water down the FOI Act – and make this type of scruitiny almost impossible.

It has released a new consultation, which asks whether public bodies should charge for every FOI request made. It cites Australia, where a fee of AUS$15 is charged for every request.

To put this in perspective, when we carry out our investigations, we need to build up a national picture, asking the same questions to 209 CCGs across the country, as well as health boards in the devolved nations.

If charges were introduced, this could mean £3,000 - £4,000 every time – without a guarantee we can even do anything with the findings. This would be unsustainable for even the richest media outlets. 

If the consultation does recommend a watering down of the FOI Act – and, with the panel made up of sceptics, this looks likely – then we, and other journalists and pressure groups who do such work, can no longer carry out these types of investigations and uncover scandal and potentially inappropriate use of public money.

The Government claims that public bodies spend £11m a year on answering FOI requests.

But this is a pittance when it comes to the proper scrutiny of the Government.

So we would urge you to sign this petition, which will only take a minute.

And, if you would like to respond to the consultation yourself, you can do so here.

Jaimie Kaffash is news editor at Pulse

Readers' comments (5)

  • I used to think the UK was one of the few true remaining democracies on this earth. It is starting to look like an American dictatorship (incognito)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ''If I had to choose between government without newspapers and newspapers without government , I wouldn't hesitate to choose the latter''
    Thomas Jefferson
    All I know is when a government 'recognised' by a relative minority ,exercises its agenda betraying principles of social justice , it fears transparency ,freedom of speech and press . No surprise is the way our politicians look upon the Chinese government and its leader(of course , money talks!) .Our health secretary , with his Chinese wife next to him, 'adores' the 'Chinese way'.

    ''We are the no-man of the no-man's land , not every choice we make are blessed with moral clarity.''
    Homeland season 4

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Ha ha ha, editor
    I kept turning anonymous with this webpage system

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunately, the system is used more by the press than anyone else, so ministers feel they are subsidising the media with the current system - and given our national financial pressures, I can understand the view. However, I agree that the fee will discourage scrutiny. A tough balance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Petition signed
    Typical
    This autocratic corrupt government is a national disgrace
    The answer why.... Because they have lots and lots of dirt to hide

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Save