Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain

  • Print
  • Comments (9)
  • Save

According to recent RCGP statistics, as a BME UK graduate, I would be five times more likely to fail the CSA component of the MRCGP compared to my white peers. Thankfully, I took the older, four part modular MRCGP and passed with distinction.

Without the deeper analysis of these figures that is so desperately needed, it would be easy to jump on the racist bandwagon. Yet there could be a variety of reasons for the differences in communication and linguistic abilities, which is ultimately what this exam is about.

What we do not know (but could easily find out) is the social class and educational background of the CSA candidates. It is widely accepted that up to one third of medical students are privately educated. (1) It is more difficult to obtain information about the ethnic breakdown of these privately educated medical students, to ascertain a greater insight in their social class. One study does confirm the greater proportion of higher social class students among white students than minority ethnic students.(2)

It is not difficult to appreciate the huge advantages that come with a private education, particularly in areas of communication. Debating societies, presentations, drama clubs – all of these serve to inject a healthy dose of self- esteem and superiority in linguistic ability. If the majority of the privately educated trainees are white, it is not surprising that they will perform (for it is, indeed, a performance) better.

And if that’s not enough, there is also the issue of linguistic ‘capital’. This refers to the mastery of language over time, facilitated by a culture driven by family, education and other opportunities. If a UK-trained BME doctor was raised in a bilingual household, attended a state school and had very few contacts outside their own family, their linguistic capital may be reduced. Although not a linguistic example, I can recall a painful example when class and culture led to my embarrassing failure to appreciate some of the finer things in life. As a medical student, I went on a few dates with a military chef who introduced me to a tapas restaurant in Soho. As soon as I saw the look on his face, when I was chomping away at the garlic prawns, I realised I had to take the shells off before eating them. Rather than admit to being a philistine, I pretended to enjoy them better this way!

It is easy to hide behind the illusion that all GPs need to have this high level of linguistic ability in order to consult. Whilst there is no denying that good communication skills are vital for risk management and patient satisfaction, it sometimes feels that the threshold is set well above this minimum level.

As well as this, there are many inner city practices where consulting takes on a whole different form. It is not unusual for me to complete a whole surgery with patients who do not speak English as their first language. Some of these consultations will be carried out in Punjabi (I am bi-lingual), some will be carried out via an interpreter and some will be carried out in very basic English. Occasionally, I will need to access my toolbox of consulting skills, but this is mainly for the purposes of teaching and training. UK society is changing and it is a shame that the RCGP does not adequately reflect this.

Racism and discrimination are strong accusations levelled at the college and need to be backed by firm evidence. However, I can empathise with IMG trainees who believe they are being set up to fail. Many feel they have overcome all the obstacles in place – PLAB, recruitment, AKT, ARCP - only to fall at the final one.

The effects on recruitment are already apparent. There is a 15% drop in training applications as well as a drop in IMG applications. Yet the bar continues to be set higher than it was ten years ago. The NHS has always needed IMGs – without them, primary care and the NHS would have buckled. This applies as much now as it did then.

 

References

 

(1)   GMC National Training Survey Nov 2013: Socioeconomic status questions

 

(2)   British Dental Journal 189, 152 – 154, Aug 2000

 

      Social background of minority ethnic applicants to Medicine and Dentistry

Readers' comments (9)

  • Una Coales

    Fascinating insights Dr Shaba Nabi MRCGP with Distinction! Social class and linguistic 'capital' are 2 further points I had not even considered! Well done!

    If NHS patients come first, then surely we should embrace all doctors and patients of all social classes and accept that the majority of patients do not have the linguistic 'capital' of privately educated GPs which should be reflected in the standard setting of the CSA exam. A bar set too high would exclude patients understanding of a GP with high linguistic 'capital' that only professional actors of equally high linguistic 'capital' could relate to and comprehend.

    How does the CSA take into account that some IMG GPs will end up serving a community of all Hindi, Tamil or Urdu speaking patients in London or other major cities? Are we doing a disservice to ethnic minority patients who would prefer the choice of a face to face with a native speaking GP to trying to explain a sensitive concern through a stranger interpreter over the phone?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    The world is still very old fashioned after all....
    Let's wait for the verdict from the JR...........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have no personal interest in this matter, but may I suggest that the GP trainees who have been kicked out and banished should be allowed to obtain CCT after one additional year of training.

    Something smells fishy in this whole training thing. There should be no support to a system which, in its administration, has proven fraught with error and has come so close to become the ultimate nightmare for many. Until one can be sure that everyone sentenced to this fate is truly incompetent, until one can be sure with moral certainty that no one with minimal competency will meet that fate, the whole process should be seen with an eye of suspicion and alternatives considered.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What I have noticed is, once a IMG gets through his / her GP training and passes the CSA, they are more confident clinically as compared to the UK trained colleagues. That would be perhaps because IMGs usually have other medical speciality training before joining GP training and also more stress is put on clinical acumen during their medical training.

    I am not sure how does the RCGP collect information to see what patients expect from their GPs ( and use this feedback in the CSA ) but from my experience patients appreciate a clinically confident GP rather that a GP who goes about beating around the bush.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And who is going to staff the new 8am - 8pm 7 days GP working scheme, if not the IMGs. RCGP needs to understand, just a bit of different english accent and not a perfect grammar makes you a bad GP,, otherwise we wouldn't have been a part of EU.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry typo error in earlier post , just a bit of different accent and not a perfect grammar does not make you a bad GP,,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "UK graduates" includes around 10-15% of overseas students studying in UK medical schools. I wonder if or how they affect the figures about the MRCGP pass rates of "UK graduates" by ethnicity?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A posh exam for posh people. The RCGP should warn people especially IMGs when they apply for the enterance not to waste their time as CSA has been specifically designed to weed out non white and non posh people.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In other words dogs, non whites and common people should not bother becoming GPs as RCGP has made sure by modifying CSA in such a way that only posh people are able to pass this exam.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (9)
  • Save