Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

We need to talk honestly about NHS cuts

  • Print
  • Comments (10)
  • Rate
  • Save

Everyone is yelling the same warning - healthcare professionals, commissioners, providers, even independent think tanks are contributing to the din. The NHS cannot maintain standards of care, and meet patient demand and expectation within its resource allocation. It just isn’t possible.

The words ‘rationing’ and ‘cuts’ must not be forbidden.

Admission of this defeat hasn’t come easily to the most cost-effective health system in the world. There has been a culture of scapegoating CEOs and finance directors of local provider and commissioner organisations who have been unable to spin straw into gold and balance the books. The practice of ‘lifting and shifting’ scapegoats out of their jobs has been seemingly justified by expensive management consultant reports that conclude that local financial challenges can be overcome. The authors rarely have responsibility for delivering proposed solutions – an enviable position.

With most providers and commissioning organisations in deficit, the scapegoating approach has become farcical. Despite independent experts declaring that ‘overspending in the NHS is largely not attributable to mismanagement’ but evidence of systemic problems, there seems to be failure of our Government to accept this reality.

Our Government is still pressing ahead with manifesto promises for the NHS, despite warnings from independent experts that it ‘must review its priorities’, both new and existing, and that new commitments ‘may not be feasible’ .

At a time in which the NHS is increasingly struggling to deliver safe healthcare to those with need, it is telling that in last year’s Conservative Party manifesto, ‘We will make the NHS more convenient for you’ was their second promise for the NHS, sitting above ‘We will offer you the safest and most compassionate care. Interestingly the ‘seven-day NHS’ is stated under convenience not safety.

In 2013, NHS England called on staff, public and politicians to have ‘open and honest debate’ about the future shape of the NHS. It stated that cuts would not be considered. So much for openness and honesty.

The NHS was beginning to topple then; it is falling now. GPs are handing back contracts, 80% of acute providers are in deficit, health inequality gaps are wide, performance has declined, the list goes on. In the name of quality improvement and productivity, some steps were taken to improve the financial situation, such as shifting un-resourced care into general practice and disinvesting in community services. We have had cuts to services, and some service restriction policies, once in place to avoid funding interventions of limited clinical value, have veered into blatant rationing.

Surely the truly honest and open debate about the future shape of the NHS is long overdue. But the debate must be informed. Everyone must understand the implications of prioritising ‘want’ and ‘convenience’ at the expense of meeting population need. Unless funding is to increase significantly, the words ‘rationing’ and ‘cuts’ must not be forbidden. There needs to be appropriate expectation of what can be delivered safely with the resources available and open acknowledgement that inadequately resourced demands have safety implications for patients and staff.

The warnings must be heeded urgently. When will the din be heard?

Dr Lisa Harrod-Rothwell is a GP in Essex and lead medical director at Londonwide LMCs

Rate this blog  (4.76 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (10)

  • When will the din be heard? Never!
    When legend conflicts with reality,print the legend
    Dr Lisa writes eloquently in Pulse
    Now let's see if any national paper picks it up and reprints,if she's asked on question time, or the one show
    Will she be interviewed for the ten o clock news? no chance!
    There is simply no public appetite to hear this message,never mind think about it, or debate it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lisa, you couldn't have put it any better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The UK national debt grows at a rate of £5,170 per second!

    http://www.nationaldebtclock.co.uk

    That is why all public services will continue to be cut. The blame for inadequate services will always be put on public sector workers. No Government will take the blame.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    Thank you for your article. Very interesting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not only this the public health workers will continue to have to subsidise the NHS by working for free for overtime and in roles that they do not get paid for.
    Also with the emmergence of Noctors, well it seems like GPs will be forced to be responsible for any Noctor action or litigation so their medical defence fees will be in effect covering the entire practice and workers and as such they will be paying for their indemnity bills.
    Again the poor old GP will be subsiding the NHS in this way.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The public won't listen, The public think they have a right to a free NHS and a right to low taxes. The public and their snivelling MPs simply won't take part in this debate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cheap is not the same as cost effective.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • STP ; sustainability and transformation Plan . STP Serenity, tranquility , peace- an amphetamine based hallucinogen. Who's been at the sweeties?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Research shows the public are willing to pay more taxes to fund the NHS properly. Either take them up on this or go co-pay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our public does not know and does not want to know that NHS is not coping. Multiple times it has happened in OOH. Whenever a visit is refused or delayed and we have to say, " there is only one doctor", our public show such a surprise.






    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

  • Print
  • Comments (10)
  • Rate
  • Save