Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

I welcome a less sweet start to the year

Dr David Turner

Dr david turner duo 3x2

The government has said something sensible about public health. Yes, I’ll repeat that again in case you thought you’d misread: the government has said something sensible about public health.

I realise agreeing with the government on anything will make me about as popular as pepper sauce in piles cream, but for once, this is not idiotic advice.

It comes in the form of a new Public Health England campaign urging parents to allow children just '100 calorie snacks, two a day max'.

Taking in 200 calories’ worth of snack food in a day may sound like enough for most children, but I’ve seen toddlers wolf down more than that on the journey between the waiting area and my consulting room. I once witnessed a pre-school child consume a whole family size bag of Maltesers in the time it took me to diagnose his mother’s self-limiting viral illness.

My new year’s hope is that we start giving brief advice to parents about cutting back on the number of between-meals sugary snacks they allow their children to consume

However, sugar has not always been cheap, readily available and consumed like water. If you watched ‘The Miniaturist’ over the Christmas holidays on television, you would have seen a depiction of the reverence with which sugar was treated a few hundred years ago. During this period drama set in 17th century Amsterdam, we see how sugar was stored as loaves and small amounts shaved off to sample after a meal. Sugar was seen as a potentially subversive substance, its import and sale tightly controlled by the state and its consumption frowned on by the more puritanical.

The fact is, children are getting fatter and unnecessary sugar consumption in the form of snacks between meals is an important cause.

Smokers have been ostracised, class A drug addicts stigmatised and yet obesity and overconsumption of sugar-rich food is still widely seen as acceptable.

So, my new year’s hope is that we put aside our own prejudices and preconceptions on sugar consumption and start giving brief advice to parents about cutting back on the number of between-meals sugary snacks they allow their children to consume.

As GPs we have always been battling to change our patients’ behaviour on the front line; encouraging weight loss, smoking cessation, being more active, drinking less alcohol.

I won’t pretend we are always successful and that offering advice doesn’t often feel like banging your head against a wall, but the consequence of doing nothing is the unopposed development of the next generation of diabetics and that is something we really could do without.

Dr David Turner is a GP in west London



Rate this article  (2.67 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (2)

  • The Government have 'said' something.
    That needs to translate to 'done' something before I would give those serial liars any credit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can’t disagree with any of this, but we are a cabal of King Canutes if we feel our lecturing will stop the sugar tide. Call it nanny state madness if you wish, but a tax on sweets and a rebate on veg is the only answer, cold hard cash trumps empty words. “5p for a plastic bag” works!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say